Italy: Italian branch exemption: operative guidelines from central revenue

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italy: Italian branch exemption: operative guidelines from central revenue

intl-updates-small.jpg
scampuddu.jpg
nieddu.jpg

Barbara

Scampuddu

Gian Luca

Nieddu

Legislative Decree No. 147/2015, in force since October 7 2015, introduced the branch exemption regime in Italy. In particular, the regime contained in the Article 168-ter of the Italian Income Tax Code (IITC) allows resident enterprises opting for an exemption regime for the profits and losses of their foreign permanent establishments (PEs) instead of the ordinary taxation regime with tax credits.

On August 28 2017, the Italian Revenue Agency published a statement of practice, foreseen in paragraph 11 of Article 168-ter, containing measures aimed at implementing the aforesaid exemption regime.

The decree includes important guidance concerning the option for the regime, the recapture of fiscal losses, the treatment of internal operations occurred in the previous five-year period, the attribution of income to the PE under the regime, the effects on a 'black list' branch, profits arising from exempt PEs and business reorganisations.

In particular, the application to the regime has to be made in the company's annual tax return related to the fiscal period in which the PE has been created. Companies with PEs already existing on October 7 2015 may adhere to the regime by finalising the option in the 2018 tax return, with effect ranging from the 2017 tax period.

The option must be exercised for all the foreign PEs according to the principle "all or nothing" and it binds any other branch established later. The company may not withdraw from the regime that ceases to apply following the closure of all exempt PEs.

As anticipated, the decree provides relevant clarifications concerning the recapture of the losses. In fact, if in the five tax years preceding the one in which the exemption regime takes effect, a resident company has offset the tax losses generated by its PE abroad, the taxable income realised by the PE in subsequent years will be subject to tax and will not benefit from an exemption until the tax losses have been totally absorbed.

The determination of the income of the exempt PE has to follow the so-called 'authorised OECD approach' (AOA) under which the PE must be considered as a separate entity carrying out the same or similar activities under the same or similar conditions, taking into account functions performed, risks assumed and assets used. Profits and losses of the PE shall be determined according to Article 152 of the IITC on the basis of a specific profit and loss and balance sheet considering all the positive and negative variations required by the tax legislation in force in the relevant fiscal year.

Moreover, the decree states also that business reorganisations do not interrupt the branch exemption regime if the receiving entity (i.e. the entity resulting from the operation) already benefits from the regime or chooses to opt for the regime in the tax return for the year in which the reorganisation takes effect.

There is also a possibility to obtain a binding ruling from the Italian Revenue Agency on the existence in Italy of a PE of a resident company abroad, as per Article 144, introduced with the Legislative Decree No. 147/2015.

Barbara Scampuddu (barbara.scampuddu@hager-partners.it) and Gian Luca Nieddu (gianluca.nieddu@hager-partners.it)

Hager&Partners

Tel: +39 02 7780711

Website: www.hager-partners.it

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The choice facing governments is not whether to adopt AI in taxation, but how to do so in a way that upholds the principles of tax fairness, writes Neil Kelley
As ITR’s client data reveals discontent with German tax advisers’ cost management, Grant Thornton’s local TP head insists it’s a two-way street
Uncertainty isn’t always a bad thing, but it’s easy to see how the Trump administration’s IRS commissioner merry-go-round may serve to undermine business confidence
The EU defended its ‘sovereign right’ to impose the tax in the face of US tariff threats; in other news, the US deputy Treasury secretary resigned after just five months
Ascoria’s chief revenue officer shares her career wisdom garnered from the disparate worlds of tax technology, electric cables, radio DJing and more
Businesses no longer have a choice when it comes to tax technology transformation. Pavlo Boyko of TMF Group says the question is simply: sink or swim?
The firm is hunting for a senior TP manager in its quest to build a full-service practice in Indonesia, A&M Tax’s Jakarta head Jaap Zwaan tells ITR
With a new government in place, the evolving tax landscape presents both opportunities and challenges for taxpayers
Major economies have expressed concerns, with China arguing a US global minimum tax exemption would be a violation of the principle of fair competition – ITR understands
Senator Richard Colbeck told ITR he was concerned by the decision to let PwC Australia tender for government contracts again after a scandal-induced ban
Gift this article