Switzerland: The impact of currency fluctuations on the CbCR threshold

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: The impact of currency fluctuations on the CbCR threshold

intl-updates-small.jpg
stocker.jpg
belet.jpg

Raoul Stocker

Jonathan Belet

On November 23 2016, the Federal Council adopted the Federal Act on the International Automatic Exchange of Country-by-Country Reports of Multinationals (the Act) that aims to implement the country-by-country reporting (CbCR) standard in Switzerland as recommended by the OECD as part of the BEPS project. The Council of States passed the Act on March 16 2017 and the National Council will discuss the draft legislation in June 2017. If the Parliament (i.e. the Council of States and the National Council) approve the proposal and a referendum is not held, the Act should enter into force at the end of 2017.

The CbC report will be required in Switzerland for fiscal years commencing on or after January 1 2018, but voluntary filing will be possible for prior years provided the Act is adopted and Switzerland has a system in place that makes it possible to file the CbC report before the end of 2017.

Multinational enterprises (MNEs) with total annual consolidated group revenues of less than CHF 900 million ($893 million) will not have to file a CbC report in Switzerland. This is in line with the OECD's guidance, which provides that the agreed threshold is €750 million or a near amount in domestic currency as of January 2015. MNE groups that comply with this local threshold requirement denominated in a local currency should not be subject to file a CbC report in any other jurisdiction that is using a threshold denominated in a different currency.

While many countries have followed the implementation guidance from the OECD and applied the January 2015 currency exchange rate to determine the equivalent threshold in domestic currency, several jurisdictions, such as Australia, convert the local threshold on the basis of an average exchange rate for the year for which the CbC report has to be filed.

This could give rise to inconsistent global CbC filing requirements for Swiss headquartered MNEs because the Swiss CbCR threshold was set on the basis of the exchange rate as of January 1 2015 and considering that the Swiss franc soared in mid-January 2015, following the decision by the Swiss National Bank to drop the cap on the franc's value against the euro, and has remained at high levels since then. For instance, a MNE group headquartered in Switzerland with a consolidated turnover of CHF 850 million will be exempt from filing according to the Swiss legislation. However, if the group has an affiliate located in Australia, it will nevertheless be required to file a CbC report as its global turnover is above the Australian threshold of A$1 billion ($737 million) converted in CHF (about CHF 762 million according to the average AUD/CHF exchange rate for 2016).

In light of the above, we recommend Swiss headquartered taxpayers to give due consideration to monetary thresholds and applicable currency exchange rates in the countries where they operate in order to assess the requirement to file a CbC report.

Raoul Stocker (rstocker@deloitte.ch) and Jonathan Belet (jbelet@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 6271 and +41 58 279 8430

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions
The profession is fundamentally restructuring itself around what tax and accounting work should be, a Thomson Reuters leader told ITR
Gift this article