Malta issues MAP guidelines

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Malta issues MAP guidelines

Malta issues new MAP guidelines

The conclusion of double tax treaties has grown to become one of Malta's key international tax policies, but its experience with mutual agreement procedures (MAP) and alternative dispute resolution mechanisms is in its infancy.

Galea-Salomone-Mark-100
Vella-Donald

Mark Galea Salomone

Donald Vella

MAP is included in each of Malta's 70 tax conventions and the respective provision has, for the most part, always aligned with Article 25 of the OECD model tax convention. However, despite Malta's little practical experience in this arena, the Maltese Commissioner for Revenue issued guidance on the MAP on December 15 2016.

The guidelines relate to a MAP under tax conventions and under the EU Arbitration Convention. With regard to a MAP under the EU Arbitration Convention, it is pertinent to note that Malta applies the recommendations found in the revised code of conduct for the effective implementation of the EU Arbitration Convention. Consequently, and for the avoidance of doubt, if there is any conflict between the Maltese guidance and the code of conduct, the provisions of the latter will prevail.

In terms of the guidelines, a taxpayer must first raise an issue (such as one relating to a transfer pricing adjustment, the attribution of profits to a permanent establishment, or dual residence conflicts, amongst others) formally by requesting assistance in writing with the relevant contracting state. Taxpayers are strongly encouraged to ensure that the person concerned in the other contracting state also contacts its competent authority. To facilitate the expeditious resolution of a MAP case, the taxpayer is encouraged to submit all supporting material, promptly and simultaneously, to both competent authorities.

The minimum requirements for a MAP request for assistance include, among others:

  • Details of the taxpayer subject to the adjustment;

  • Contact details of the foreign tax administration;

  • Tax assessment years/periods involved;

  • Summary and analysis of the facts and issues;

  • Applicable articles of the relevant treaty; and

  • Copies of correspondence from the other tax administration.

Certain considerations are to be taken into account by the Inland Revenue Department (IRD) regarding whether they will accept a MAP request. If accepted, the IRD must communicate regularly with its counterpart (every 90 days), and must ensure that the matter is resolved in a timely manner. Once the matter is resolved, the Malta competent authority must communicate the terms of the resolution to the taxpayer imminently. If the request is denied, this decision may be appealed by the taxpayer.

The guidelines state that whilst the time taken to complete a MAP case may vary according to its complexity, the IRD will endeavour to conduct the MAP process as expeditiously as possible and to complete the case within 24 months from the date of acceptance of the taxpayer's MAP request.

The issuance of the guidelines is a step in the right direction for taxpayers. Not only is it an informative tool that sheds further light on the procedure followed by the IRD when a cross-border international tax dispute arises, but it also includes firm commitments from the Commissioner of Revenue to endeavour to resolve such disputes in a timely and efficient manner.

Mark Galea Salomone (mark.galeasalomone@camilleripreziosi.com) and Donald Vella (donald.vella@camilleripreziosi.com)

Camilleri Preziosi

Tel: +356 21238989

Website: www.camilleripreziosi.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The firm has appointed Deloitte’s former tax leader for Thailand to lead the new operation, which builds on considerable Asian investment in recent months
The Donald Trump administration could use legislation from 1930 if the Supreme Court blocks its tariffs; in other news, China has updated its VAT refund procedures
Braun gives ITR an exclusive insight into WTS Digital’s UK launch of its AI product, which can free up more than 1,500 hours per month by reducing routine tasks
Long tells ITR about her varied role, why curiosity is a key characteristic for the tax professional, and what she’d be doing if she wasn’t working in tax
The choice facing governments is not whether to adopt AI in taxation, but how to do so in a way that upholds the principles of tax fairness, writes Neil Kelley
As ITR’s client data reveals discontent with German tax advisers’ cost management, Grant Thornton’s local TP head insists it’s a two-way street
Uncertainty isn’t always a bad thing, but it’s easy to see how the Trump administration’s IRS commissioner merry-go-round may serve to undermine business confidence
The EU defended its ‘sovereign right’ to impose the tax in the face of US tariff threats; in other news, the US deputy Treasury secretary resigned after just five months
Ascoria’s chief revenue officer shares her career wisdom garnered from the disparate worlds of tax technology, electric cables, radio DJing and more
Businesses no longer have a choice when it comes to tax technology transformation. Pavlo Boyko of TMF Group says the question is simply: sink or swim?
Gift this article