Malta: Alternative trading platforms – taxation of capital gains update

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Malta: Alternative trading platforms – taxation of capital gains update

intl-updates

Towards the end of 2017, Malta's capital gains rules (subsidiary legislation 123.27 to the Income Tax Act, Cap 123 of the laws of Malta) were amended and now include a specific rule relating to the taxation of capital gains derived by an original shareholder from the transfer of shares that have been admitted for trading on an alternative trading platform.

For the purposes of the new rule, 'alternative trading platform' is a platform (as defined in Commission Regulation (EU) No. 651/2014) that is operated by the Malta Stock Exchange. In terms of the new rule, the capital gain is to be derived by the original shareholder of the shares, that is, the person who was a shareholder of the company before any of its shares were admitted for trading on an alternative trading platform and is not limited to instances where there was only a sole original shareholder. 'Original shareholder' is broadly defined to also include within scope:

  • The spouse, or direct descendant, or spouse of a direct descendant, of an original shareholder;

  • A trust or a company, partnership, foundation or other legal person whose beneficiaries are, to the extent of more than 50%, original shareholders or which trust, company, partnership foundation or other legal person is owned and controlled, whether directly or indirectly, to the extent of more than 50% by the original shareholders; or

  • A shareholder in a company who acquired his/her shares from an original shareholder by transmission causa mortis, that is, which devolved upon the demise of the original shareholder, or any other transfer to which the new rule did not apply.

In computing the capital gains derived by an original shareholder, the chargeable amount on which tax is to be calculated is to be computed as per the normal rules; generally the selling price of the said shares, less the cost of acquisition and relevant deductions. However, the chargeable amount is to be multiplied by varying percentages, dependent on the level of public participation in the company in which the shares are held. The level of public participation means the percentage of the equity shares in the said company held by persons who are not original shareholders at the particular end of the day on which the transfer in question is affected. Where the level of public participation is:

  • Less than 10%: 100% of the taxable portion;

  • At least 10% but less than 15%: 75% of the taxable portion;

  • At least 15% but less than 20%: 50% of the taxable portion;

  • At least 20% but less than 25%: 25% of the taxable portion; and

  • 25% or more: 0% of the taxable portion.

The new rule also adds that when a person who is not an original shareholder transfers shares in a company that have been admitted for trading on an alternative trading platform and the level of public participation in the company is at least 10%, no tax is to be chargeable on capital gains derived from that transfer. The rules are in line with recent announcements as well as legislative developments targeted at incentivising the domestic financial markets.

Salomone

vella.jpg

Mark Galea

Salomone

Donald Vella

Mark Galea Salomone (mark.galeasalomone@camilleripreziosi.com) and Donald Vella (donald.vella@camilleripreziosi.com)

Camilleri Preziosi

Tel: +356 21238989

Website: www.camilleripreziosi.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Ryan hopes the buyout will help it expand into Asia and the Middle East; in other news, three German finance ministers have called for a suspension of pillar two
SKAT, which was represented by Pinsent Masons, had accused Sanjay Shah and other defendants of fraudulent dividend tax refund claims
TP managers must be able to explain technical issues in simple terms, ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum heard
Prudential had challenged HMRC over VAT group relief; in other news, Donald Trump unveiled timber and wood tariffs, and the European Commission published a ViDA implementation strategy
Australia’s CbCR rules have ‘widespread support’ and do not put American companies at a competitive disadvantage, the FACT Coalition said
Baker McKenzie advised two of the member firms involved, while several advisers provided transaction counsel to US-based Grant Thornton Advisors
Foreign remittance requirements put additional administrative burden on Indian law firms and strain their relationship with foreign associate firms, according to practitioners
She will formally take over the leadership of the private client firm in July next year, succeeding the veteran Margaret Robertson
Turley will succeed the veteran Grant Wardell-Johnson on Wednesday, October 1
Gift this article