Chilean withholding tax of 35% on outbound payments for video games

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chilean withholding tax of 35% on outbound payments for video games

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-pwc.png
intl-updates

Bearing in mind that nowadays more than half of the population of the US plays video games and that live gaming events have been watched more than the NBA finals, the importance of the video game industry and its impact on the market has increased substantially during recent years.

Nearly 80% of the transactions in certain mobile app markets relate to video games.

It would be reasonable to expect, therefore, that governments would begin to show more interest in the taxation of the video game industry, which may, as we have mentioned, represent an important income flow for a country's treasury.

As regards the Chilean tax framework, the tax on an outbound payment in relation to video games depends on its qualification for legal purposes. Until now, the majority of local tax professionals were of the opinion that such a payment should be characterised as a payment for the use of standard software, which is exempted from Chilean withholding tax.

As far as standard software license is concerned, it is defined according to the usage rights that are provided, limiting them to only the relevant rights necessary for the use of the software program and not for other purposes, for example for the program's commercial exploitation, reproduction or modification.

However, a recent ruling of the Chilean Internal Revenue Service (IRS) stated the tax administration's opinion on the matter, establishing that the standard software exemption does not apply to payments sent overseas in relation to video games. This opinion was provided in the context of video games that are obtained from the internet, that can be used either by connecting to the internet or by downloading the games, with payment being made through a periodical subscription or through in-game payments in the context of free to play games.

In the IRS' view, video games consist of a set of instructions, images and sounds, with the purpose of obtaining entertainment and recreation, for use on computers or other devices. The IRS recognised that video games require a software support, but also deemed that the real nature of the transaction was not limited simply to an item of software. Rather, the IRS viewed it as a complex piece of work that involved artistic creation including concepts of an environment, characters, and history, with the intention of communicating ideas and allowing the interaction of the user with the virtual world and other users.

Hence, the IRS concluded that the payment for the provision of a video game should qualify as a payment for an entertainment and recreation service, falling under the generic taxable event of 'services rendered abroad', and subject to a 35% withholding tax. The foreign beneficiary of the payment and the local withholding agent are responsible for the payment of the said tax obligation.

The criterion on which the IRS based its ruling on this matter was not well received by the video game industry or by tax specialists. The fact that a video game could be considered as a service rather than as an intangible asset involving standard software appears rather outdated and not in line with prevailing views within the technology industry.

We do not expect that this discussion on the qualification of these and similar digital products will end any time soon. This is just a demonstration that technology moves faster than our local legislation, and there is still a lot of work to do in adapting the Chilean tax rules to the reality of this industry.

Astrid Schudeck and Gregorio Martínez

PwC

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Veteran Elizabeth Arrendale will lead the new advisory practice, which will support clients with M&A tax structuring, post-deal integration, and more
MAP cases keep increasing, and cases closed aren’t keeping pace with the number started, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also told an ITR summit
Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Ryan hopes the buyout will help it expand into Asia and the Middle East; in other news, three German finance ministers have called for a suspension of pillar two
SKAT, which was represented by Pinsent Masons, had accused Sanjay Shah and other defendants of fraudulent dividend tax refund claims
TP managers must be able to explain technical issues in simple terms, ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum heard
Prudential had challenged HMRC over VAT group relief; in other news, Donald Trump unveiled timber and wood tariffs, and the European Commission published a ViDA implementation strategy
Australia’s CbCR rules have ‘widespread support’ and do not put American companies at a competitive disadvantage, the FACT Coalition said
Baker McKenzie advised two of the member firms involved, while several advisers provided transaction counsel to US-based Grant Thornton Advisors
Foreign remittance requirements put additional administrative burden on Indian law firms and strain their relationship with foreign associate firms, according to practitioners
Gift this article