Chilean withholding tax of 35% on outbound payments for video games

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chilean withholding tax of 35% on outbound payments for video games

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-pwc.png
intl-updates

Bearing in mind that nowadays more than half of the population of the US plays video games and that live gaming events have been watched more than the NBA finals, the importance of the video game industry and its impact on the market has increased substantially during recent years.

Nearly 80% of the transactions in certain mobile app markets relate to video games.

It would be reasonable to expect, therefore, that governments would begin to show more interest in the taxation of the video game industry, which may, as we have mentioned, represent an important income flow for a country's treasury.

As regards the Chilean tax framework, the tax on an outbound payment in relation to video games depends on its qualification for legal purposes. Until now, the majority of local tax professionals were of the opinion that such a payment should be characterised as a payment for the use of standard software, which is exempted from Chilean withholding tax.

As far as standard software license is concerned, it is defined according to the usage rights that are provided, limiting them to only the relevant rights necessary for the use of the software program and not for other purposes, for example for the program's commercial exploitation, reproduction or modification.

However, a recent ruling of the Chilean Internal Revenue Service (IRS) stated the tax administration's opinion on the matter, establishing that the standard software exemption does not apply to payments sent overseas in relation to video games. This opinion was provided in the context of video games that are obtained from the internet, that can be used either by connecting to the internet or by downloading the games, with payment being made through a periodical subscription or through in-game payments in the context of free to play games.

In the IRS' view, video games consist of a set of instructions, images and sounds, with the purpose of obtaining entertainment and recreation, for use on computers or other devices. The IRS recognised that video games require a software support, but also deemed that the real nature of the transaction was not limited simply to an item of software. Rather, the IRS viewed it as a complex piece of work that involved artistic creation including concepts of an environment, characters, and history, with the intention of communicating ideas and allowing the interaction of the user with the virtual world and other users.

Hence, the IRS concluded that the payment for the provision of a video game should qualify as a payment for an entertainment and recreation service, falling under the generic taxable event of 'services rendered abroad', and subject to a 35% withholding tax. The foreign beneficiary of the payment and the local withholding agent are responsible for the payment of the said tax obligation.

The criterion on which the IRS based its ruling on this matter was not well received by the video game industry or by tax specialists. The fact that a video game could be considered as a service rather than as an intangible asset involving standard software appears rather outdated and not in line with prevailing views within the technology industry.

We do not expect that this discussion on the qualification of these and similar digital products will end any time soon. This is just a demonstration that technology moves faster than our local legislation, and there is still a lot of work to do in adapting the Chilean tax rules to the reality of this industry.

Astrid Schudeck and Gregorio Martínez

PwC

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The event comes at an important moment for professionals dealing with practical realities related to this practice area
Germany’s dogmatic restriction of third-party investment in tax advisory firms will only serve to slow down innovation and access to justice
The Irish government has been told that it’s spending too much of its corporation tax receipts and should instead focus on running bigger surpluses; plus, the IRS is set to merge tax practitioner offices
A company risks double taxation, penalties and inquiry cost if it submits a form with anomalies under the new system, Asker Ali also tells ITR
Arindam Mitra and Robin Hart examine how aggregate TP rules clash with transaction-level customs rules, creating compliance risks and requiring granular, SKU-level pricing strategies
The scandal has come just three years after the PwC tax leaks controversy and has prompted KPMG’s Australian chief executive to resign
In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
Gift this article