Switzerland: A year in review and an outlook on the tax landscape

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: A year in review and an outlook on the tax landscape

intl-updates-small.jpg

In 2017, Switzerland continued to be an ever more attractive tax location for multinational and domestic enterprises alike, while at the same time becoming more aligned with international tax legislation, a trend that will continue for 2018.

The dominant topic in 2017 was the so-called Swiss Tax Reform 17 (STR 17) under which all special tax regimes, such as the mixed company regime, will sunset, accompanied by a transition mechanism of five years, and be replaced by other measures, such as a significant reduction of cantonal tax rates, the introduction of a patent box, or R&D incentives. While the Swiss voter rejected the original version of the reform in a referendum on February 12 2017, the Swiss Federal government on September 6 2017 issued a revised draft legislation. The final legislation is expected to be discussed by the Swiss Parliament in the spring of 2018. Since this is considered a well-balanced legislation brought about with the inclusion of all stakeholders, a referendum on the legislation may be considered unlikely, so that STR 17 could enter into force as soon as January 1 2019.

A cornerstone of the tax reform is a reduction of cantonal tax rates, where most cantons expect to be in the 12-14% ETR range (effective combined federal/cantonal/communal rate). On November 1 2017, the canton of Vaud became the first canton to officially reduce its tax rate to an ETR of 13.79% as of January 1 2019.

As of January 1 2018, the Swiss VAT rate will be reduced from 8% to 7.7% (standard rate) and from 3.8% to 3.7% (special rate), while the reduced rate of 2.5% will remain unchanged.

The Swiss government enacted tax friendly withholding tax legislation on February 15 2017 under which the notification procedure on intra-group dividends applies if the respective conditions are met, even if the 30-day deadline is missed, and no-late interest will be applied. Taxpayers who already paid late interest may claim such late interest back if the conditions are met.

On the international front, Switzerland on June 7 2017 signed the Multilateral Instrument (MLI) on the implementation of tax related measures against base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) with a first batch of 14 countries. The agreement will allow Switzerland to adapt double taxation agreements to the minimum standards as agreed under the OECD BEPS project.

And finally, from 2018, the Swiss tax authorities will start to exchange tax rulings internationally. Rulings will be exchanged that are still in force as of January 1 2018 and were entered into after January 1 2010. Switzerland does not share rulings retroactively. Taxpayers who do not wish to share their rulings have the opportunity to withdraw their rulings before the end of 2017.

With the enacted and upcoming changes in its tax legislation Switzerland seems well equipped to continue to play a major role as an attractive tax and business location for multinationals in the years ahead.

kistler.jpg
Zulauf

Jacques Kistler (jkistler@deloitte.ch) and René Zulauf (rzulauf@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 6359 and +41 58 279 8164

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The event comes at an important moment for professionals dealing with practical realities related to this practice area
Germany’s dogmatic restriction of third-party investment in tax advisory firms will only serve to slow down innovation and access to justice
The Irish government has been told that it’s spending too much of its corporation tax receipts and should instead focus on running bigger surpluses; plus, the IRS is set to merge tax practitioner offices
A company risks double taxation, penalties and inquiry cost if it submits a form with anomalies under the new system, Asker Ali also tells ITR
Arindam Mitra and Robin Hart examine how aggregate TP rules clash with transaction-level customs rules, creating compliance risks and requiring granular, SKU-level pricing strategies
The scandal has come just three years after the PwC tax leaks controversy and has prompted KPMG’s Australian chief executive to resign
In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
Gift this article