Malta: Notional interest deduction rules

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Malta: Notional interest deduction rules

intl-updates-small.jpg

The Maltese notional interest deduction rules (the rules) were published on October 5 2017, further to an announcement made in the previous 2017 budget. Traditionally, debt financing in Malta has been regarded as more efficient from a tax perspective due to the deductibility against chargeable income of finance costs incurred by companies upon the granting of loans. The main objective of the rules is to approximate the manner in which cost of equity and cost of debt are treated from a tax perspective. The rules provide certain undertakings with the possibility of deducting interest they are deemed to have incurred on equity.

Effective from year of assessment 2018, companies and partnerships resident in Malta, or permanent establishments in Malta of a non-Maltese resident undertaking may elect to avail of the rules.

The notional interest deduction (NID) is calculated by multiplying:

a) The deemed NID, which is the risk-free rate set by reference to the current yield to maturity on Malta government stocks with a remaining term of approximately 20 years, plus a 5% premium; and

b) The risk capital of the undertaking at the end of the relevant financial year, which includes share/partnership capital, share premium, positive retained earnings, interest-free loans, any other reserves resulting from a contribution to the undertaking, and any other item that is shown as equity in the undertaking's financial statements.

The rules prescribe that shareholders or partners of an undertaking that has claimed NID will be deemed to have received an amount of income equal to the interest on risk capital from that undertaking. Where the undertaking has more than one shareholder or partner, each shareholder or partner will be deemed to have received an amount of deemed income that is proportionate to the nominal value of the risk capital pertaining to that particular shareholder or partner.

The maximum amount of NID that can be claimed in a financial year is set at 90% of the undertaking's chargeable income, although it will be possible for an undertaking to carry forward any excess. Any remaining chargeable income will be subject to Maltese income tax at the standard rates. Where a shareholder or partner of the undertaking is not resident in Malta, the deemed interest should be exempt from tax in Malta provided certain conditions are satisfied.

It is pertinent to note that dividend distributions made out of profits in respect of which the NID was availed will not be chargeable to any further tax at shareholder or partner level. Moreover, the rules also include anti-avoidance provisions in order to curb potential abuse use of the NID system.

Salomone
Vella-Donald

Mark Galea Salomone (mark.galeasalomone@camilleripreziosi.com) and Donald Vella (donald.vella@camilleripreziosi.com)

Camilleri Preziosi

Tel: +356 21238989

Website: www.camilleripreziosi.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
Gift this article