Argentina: Developments expected on payment mechanism of non-resident capital gains tax

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Argentina: Developments expected on payment mechanism of non-resident capital gains tax

intl-updates-small.jpg
Rodriguez-Ignacio

Ignacio Rodríguez

Since September 23 2013, capital gains derived from the transfer of shares in an Argentine company, as well as other securities obtained by non-residents, have been subject to Argentine tax.

The seller has the option – to be expressly notified to the withholding agent – of determining its tax liability by applying the 15% rate on the actual capital gain realised, duly supported, determined in Argentine currency or on a presumed basis consisting of 90% of the sales proceeds (13.5% effective rate).

So far, however, no tax had to be paid on transactions between non-residents because the Argentine tax rules did not establish a mechanism to withhold and remit that tax.

On July 18 2017, through General Resolution 4094-E, the Argentine tax authorities established the long-awaited mechanism to withhold and pay the tax due on transactions involving the transfer of Argentine securities, such as shares and equity interests in local mutual funds.

The seller's stock broker must act as the withholding tax agent if the shares are sold through a stock exchange that is authorised by the Argentine Securities Exchange Commission (CNV). If the sale does not take place through a stock exchange, then the buyer must act as the withholding tax agent, even if they are a non-resident. Neither the Income Tax Law nor the General Resolution specify the withholding tax mechanism in cases where Argentine shares are sold through a foreign stock exchange. In these situations it is uncertain whether the seller's broker or the buyer should withhold the tax.

If the buyer is a non-resident, or the transaction takes place in a foreign stock exchange, the relevant party must remit the tax to the tax authorities through an international bank wire transfer considering the information needed to prepare the respective order and the list of authorised collecting agencies on the tax authority's website (http://www.afip.gob.ar). The tax payment will be rejected if the withholding tax agent fails to provide certain information, such as the tax ID of the entity whose shares have been transferred or if the transfer is made locally.

Also, whoever is required to register the share transfer with the corporate authorities is required to provide to the tax authorities the notification of the transfer, the buyer's and seller's identities, and a copy of the withholding tax payment voucher.

Resolution 4094-E, which entered into force on July 18 2017, applies to transactions concluded on or after September 23 2013. For sales of securities concluded prior to July 18 2017, the due date to remit the tax withheld was September 29 2017.

Not surprisingly, the tax authorities received many complaints due to the retroactive effective date and the need for those who are liable to update their systems. In response, on July 20 2017, the Argentine tax authorities issued General Resolution No. 4095-E suspending the application of General Resolution 4094-E for 180 days.

It may be expected that during the suspension period the Argentine tax authorities will clarify certain open questions with regard to General Resolution No. 4094-E.

Ignacio Rodríguez (ignacio.e.rodriguez@ar.pwc.com), Buenos Aires

PwC

Tel: +54 11 4850 6714

Website: www.pwc.com/ar

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Awards
It was another banner year for Deloitte, which picked up more awards than any other firm at a gala ceremony held at The Londoner in Leicester Square
The big four firm has been embroiled in a scandal over partners’ misuse of confidential board papers to pitch for and win corporate audits for Westpac and Dexus
Drawing on lessons from the PepsiCo case, tax lawyer Paul McNab explains why the ATO's latest royalty guidance should concern multinationals well beyond the technology sector
As pillar two exposes the limits of fragmented tax processes, organisations are rethinking their operating models to create the trusted data foundations that AI demands
World Tax data shows Matt Donnelly is moving from a Tier 3 transactional tax practice to a Tier 1 market leader, underlining Kirkland & Ellis’s pull at the top end of the market
Nexdigm's Maulik Doshi and infer360 co-founder Sunil Agarwal dig deeper into their partnership and discuss why the tax technology industry is consolidating
Advisers won’t be short of work in a world of increased valuation disputes, documentation requirements and behavioural responses from clients seeking to protect their wealth
Jaydeep Menon explains how Frazier & Deeter built a specialist practice which helps UK start-ups expand into the US and why private equity backing is accelerating its ambitions
As joint audits, data sharing and pillar two reshape tax controversy, multinational groups can no longer afford to manage disputes one jurisdiction at a time
Brazil's tax system is being reshaped by VAT , pillar two and TP reform. Fallet explains why those changes convinced him to lead a new practice
Gift this article