Norway: Alterations of the Norwegian tonnage tax regime

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Norway: Alterations of the Norwegian tonnage tax regime

intl-updates-small.jpg
ragna.jpg

Ragna Flækøy Skjåkødegård

The Ministry of Finance recently published its letter of notification of the tonnage tax regime to the EFTA Surveillance Agency (ESA), outlining the following alterations in the existing tonnage tax regime:

Bareboat chartering out

The following restrictions/alterations are introduced for bareboat chartering out:

  • Bareboat chartering out is limited to 50% of the total tonnage of the company group's fleet within the tonnage tax regime during an income year. The Ministry of Finance suggest that there should be an option to measure the bareboat chartered out fleet over a period of four years.

  • Bareboat charters must not exceed a contractual period of 5 (+3) years, i.e. five years with the option to extend for three years. Bareboat contracts exceeding 5+3 years will thus constitute disqualifying assets.

  • Strategical management of all vessels chartered out on bareboat terms must be performed from within the EEA.

The Ministry states that intra-group bareboat chartering out will be allowed "unconditionally". There are no limitations introduced for chartering in on bareboat terms.

The limitations are, as a starting point, applicable to new bareboat chartering out contracts. Tonnage chartered out on existing contracts, including options to extend for up to three years, will not be included in the limitation introduced. However, this transitional rule will not apply to what the Ministry calls "long-term contracts", defined as contracts of a duration of more than five years. Long-term contracts will thus be disqualifying for the tonnage tax regime.

Voyage charter/time charter

The Ministry notifies a limitation of 90% on the chartering in of non-EEA flagged vessels on time charter or voyage charter terms. Any limitations will be measured on a yearly basis, but counting the tonnage chartered out for each day of the year. The tonnage will be measured on a company group level. The limitation will only apply to new chartering in contracts.

Inclusion of windmill farm vessels

The Ministry of Finance notifies that vessels involved with construction, maintenance, repair and disassembly of windmills at sea are qualifying for the tonnage tax regime. Up to now, the windmill farm vessels have only constituted qualifying assets to the tonnage tax regime if they have been used in transportation assignments. The extension is notified to take effect from January 1 2017, and the extension was adopted by the Parliament in December 2016, but is awaiting the approval from ESA.

The extension does not comprise windmill farm vessels operating in Norwegian internal waters or Norwegian territorial waters.

Exclusion of vessels not being self-propelled and operating in foreign inland waterways

The Ministry of Finance also notifies that vessels that are not self-propelled and operating mainly in foreign inland waterways should not qualify for the tonnage tax regime. Vessels that are not self-propelled and operating mainly in Norwegian waterways are disqualifying according the current tonnage tax regime.

Except for the extension regarding windmill farm vessels, the alterations are planned to take effect from July 1 2017.

Ragna Flækøy Skjåkødegård (rskjakodegard@deloitte.no), Oslo

Deloitte

Tel: +47 23 27 96 00

Website: www.deloitte.no

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A lack of commitment from major jurisdictions and the associated compliance burden are obstacles facing the OECD initiative
Richard Gregg is no longer fit and proper to be a tax agent, said the TPB; in other news, MHA completed its acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Recent Indian case law emphasises the importance of economic substance over mere legal form in evaluating tax implications, say authors from Khaitan & Co
PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the ATO was advised by MinterEllison, an Australian-headquartered law firm
Three tax experts dissect the impact of a 30% tariff that has shaken up trade relations between South Africa and the US
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Americas Tax Awards
As we move into an era of ‘substance over form’, determining the fundamental nature of a particular instrument is key when evaluating the tax implications of selling hybrid securities
It stands in stark contrast to a mere 1% increase in firmwide revenue since last year
It follows a court case concerning a Freedom of Information request lodged by the founder of a software company
After years of deafening silence, the UK tax authority is taking overdue action against corporates that fail to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion
Gift this article