Switzerland: Swiss Federal Council to introduce revised CTR III legislation quickly

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Swiss Federal Council to introduce revised CTR III legislation quickly

kistler.jpg
Zulauf

Jacques Kistler

Rene Zulauf

After the rejection of Corporate Tax Reform III (CTR III) by the Swiss electorate on February 12 2017, the Swiss Federal Council now plans to introduce revised legislation of the tax reform quickly and has instructed the finance ministry accordingly.

The Swiss finance ministry intends to set the parameters for a revised CTR III by the end of June 2017 and plans to hold hearings with interested parties on the reform from March until the end of June 2017.

The exact parameters of a revised legislation remain open and assumptions on what a revised legislative proposal will entail are speculative in nature. However, it can reasonably be assumed that a revised CTR III will likely be a compromise built around the largely undisputed measures of the rejected tax reform. The largely undisputed measures were essentially the following parameters of the rejected tax reform, which can be reasonably expected to also be part of a revised tax reform:

  • The phasing out of all special corporate tax regimes, such as the mixed, domiciliary, holding and principal company regimes, as well as the finance branch regime;

  • A reduction of the general cantonal/communal tax rates at the discretion of the individual cantons;

  • The introduction of a mandatory cantonal-level patent box regime applicable to all patented intellectual property (IP) for which the research and development (R&D) spend occurred in Switzerland, based on the OECD modified nexus approach;

  • The introduction of cantonal R&D incentives in the form of deductions of up to 150% of qualifying R&D expenditure at the discretion of the individual cantons;

  • A step-up of asset basis (including for self-created goodwill) for direct federal and cantonal/communal tax purposes upon the migration of a company or additional activities and functions into Switzerland;

  • The tax-privileged release of hidden reserves for cantonal/communal tax purposes for companies transitioning out of tax-privileged cantonal tax regimes (such as mixed or holding companies) into ordinary taxation; and

  • A reduction of the cantonal/communal annual net wealth tax in relation to the holding of participations and of patented IP at the discretion of the individual cantons.

However, it is possible that there will also be some fine tuning around the largely undisputed parts of the tax reform, most likely in regards to R&D super deductions.

What is unlikely to remain in a revised legislation, however, is the introduction of a notional interest deduction (NID) regime at the federal level and at the discretion of the individual cantons.

Although it still may be possible for revised legislation to meet the original January 1 2019 introduction timetable at the federal level if the Swiss parliament decides on the revised legislation in its winter 2017/2018 session, since the cantons need adequate time to introduce the law into cantonal legislation, the introduction of the law may be postponed by one to two years, i.e. to January 1 2020 or 2021.

Jacques Kistler (jkistler@deloitte.ch) and Rene Zulauf (rzulauf@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 8164 and +41 58 279 6359

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The event comes at an important moment for professionals dealing with practical realities related to this practice area
Germany’s dogmatic restriction of third-party investment in tax advisory firms will only serve to slow down innovation and access to justice
The Irish government has been told that it’s spending too much of its corporation tax receipts and should instead focus on running bigger surpluses; plus, the IRS is set to merge tax practitioner offices
A company risks double taxation, penalties and inquiry cost if it submits a form with anomalies under the new system, Asker Ali also tells ITR
Arindam Mitra and Robin Hart examine how aggregate TP rules clash with transaction-level customs rules, creating compliance risks and requiring granular, SKU-level pricing strategies
The scandal has come just three years after the PwC tax leaks controversy and has prompted KPMG’s Australian chief executive to resign
In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
Gift this article