Canada: Canadian government reaffirms commitment to combatting domestic and offshore tax avoidance and evasion

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada: Canadian government reaffirms commitment to combatting domestic and offshore tax avoidance and evasion

penny.jpg
bazarkewich.jpg

Kathleen Penny

Shavone Bazarkewich

On February 22 2017, the Canadian government responded to the recommendations made in the sixth report of the Standing Committee on Finance entitled: The Canada Revenue Agency, Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion: Recommended Actions (standing committee report). The response generally supported all 14 recommendations of the standing committee report and reaffirmed the government's commitment to cracking down on tax evasion and perceived "aggressive tax avoidance".

Notable comments included the following:

  • The government will consider whether the reportable transactions legislation should be expanded;

  • Recommendations from the Offshore Compliance Advisory Committee's first report to the minister will be used to review the voluntary disclosures program (VDP). The review will be completed by March 31 2017 and will likely result in changes to narrow the criteria for acceptance into the VDP;

  • Guidelines used to determine whether to pursue litigation or to seek a settlement with taxpayers that have engaged in tax avoidance or tax evasion are being reviewed;

  • The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) will review the informant leads program and the offshore tax informant program in order to encourage informants to come forward, as well as to modernise intake and interaction with information;

  • Canada's exchange of information relationships are being, or will be, reviewed to ensure that bank secrecy or lack of a domestic tax interest cannot be used to deny information exchange;

  • The government will strive to work closely with other jurisdictions to fight offshore non-compliance and international tax evasion and avoidance; and

  • A report providing practical guidelines for the implementation of a base erosion and project shifting (BEPS) action item related to risk assessment and reporting by large multi-national enterprises will be released in spring 2017.

Despite setting out the differences between tax evasion, a potentially criminal offence, and tax avoidance, a minimisation of tax liability within the letter of the law, the government's response sometimes failed to clearly distinguish between the two. This is concerning when considering how the standing committee report's recommendations will be implemented, particularly when a number of the recommendations contemplate the review of tax compliance mechanisms and penalties.

The government has clearly reiterated its dedication to cracking down on tax evasion and aggressive tax avoidance. The government's response, as well as the standing committee report, indicates that offshore compliance will be a focus of these efforts. In the press release announcing the tabling of the government's response, the CRA indicated that it is criminally investigating 20 cases of tax evasion related to offshore accounts. In addition, the government's response mentions that 60 taxpayers are under audit as a result of review of the 'Panama Papers' scandal.

Kathleen Penny (kathleen.penny@blakes.com) and Shavone Bazarkewich (shavone.bazarkewich@blakes.com), Toronto

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Tel: +1 416 863 3898 and +1 416 863 2994

Website: www.blakes.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article