Switzerland: Geneva State Council releases plan on how to implement Corporate Tax Reform III

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Geneva State Council releases plan on how to implement Corporate Tax Reform III

intl-updates-small.jpg
kistler.jpg
page.jpg

Jacques Kistler

Jean-Pierre Page

As part of the so-called Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III (CTR III), likely to enter into force on January 1 2019, all special corporate tax regimes, such as mixed, holding or principal company regimes, will be phased out and replaced by other measures.

Geneva put together a competitive plan on how to implement CTR III to ensure that the canton remains attractive, both for existing multinationals and for companies looking to migrate to the canton of Geneva. The key features of the plan are as follows:

  • Reducing the corporate income tax rate from 24.2% to 13.49%;

  • Introducing a patent box regime for cantonal/communal tax purposes for qualifying patent income, following the modified nexus approach under BEPS Action 5;

  • Introducing R&D super deductions of up to 150%;

  • Providing an income tax credit against cantonal/communal capital tax, a reduced capital tax rate of 0.01% on equity that is underpinning participations, patent box related assets and intra group loans;

  • Introducing a notional interest deduction (NID) at the federal level, but not at the cantonal/communal level;

  • Limiting the benefit of various tax incentives to ensure an effective tax rate of at least 13%, which can be further reduced if the taxpayer can apply the NID at a federal level; and

  • Introducing an additional 0.3% levy on the cantonal income tax rate to create a fund to support innovation. The levy will apply for the first five years from when CTR III enters into force.

The tax law will be introduced into the Geneva parliament, most likely in November 2016, with an expected vote in the spring of 2017. The vote by the Geneva lawmakers is expected by the end of 2017, so that the law would be ready when CTR III is introduced, most likely on January 1 2019.

Jacques Kistler (jkistler@deloitte.ch) and Jean-Pierre Page (jepage@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte Switzerland

Tel: +41 58 279 8164 and +41 58 279 8209

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
Gift this article