Indonesia: Indonesia targeting cross-border and online transactions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Indonesia: Indonesia targeting cross-border and online transactions

Karyadi-Freddy
Puspita

Freddy Karyadi

Luna Puspita

In March 2016, the Indonesian Government disclosed its plan to optimise tax revenue from various uncollected taxes due on cross-border and online transactions involving the e-commerce business sector and certain individual taxpayers.

Further, the Ministry of Finance has unveiled its data relating to at least 6,000 Indonesian citizens having offshore accounts and around 2,000 foreign investment companies which are alleged to have engaged in illegal tax abuse by committing improper cross-border transfer pricing and by abusing tax holidays and tax incentives. The Indonesia Investment Coordinating Board (BKPM) may revoke the business licenses of such foreign invesment companies if the allegation is proven.

To follow up the Panama Papers, during April 2016, the government states it will first validate the information in the Panama Papers then match those records with its own data relating to alleged unreported assets and income of certain Indonesian individuals and corporations in order to find any room to improve tax revenue. The data pertaining to credit card transactions which are now transparent to the tax authority would also be used to boost the tax revenue. Further, other government agencies such as the anti-money laundering agency, the customs authority and the National drugs body would share their information with the tax authority to improve the tax authority's ability to analyse the tax revenue potency.

Simultaneously, according to the press, the tax authority indicates that Google, Yahoo, Facebook and Twitter in Indonesia have not fully complied with their tax obligation as they have only registered themselves as representative offices instead of as permanent establishments generating income from Indonesia. A representative office in Indonesia is not allowed to generate revenue in Indonesia. From the investigation conducted, it is alleged that the revenues obtained by Google, Yahoo, Facebook and Twitter in Indonesia are booked directly by their companies in Singapore. Aside from these four tech companies, a further 3,500 representative offices of foreign entities are also under scrutiny of the tax authority for similar reasons.

Freddy Karyadi (fkaryadi@abnrlaw.com) and Luna Puspita (lpuspita@abnrlaw.com), Jakarta

Ali Budiardjo, Nugroho, Reksodiputro, Counsellors at Law

Tel: +62 21 250 5125

Website: www.abnrlaw.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Authors from Khaitan & Co dissect a ‘welcome’ ruling, which found that the mere existence of a tax benefit would not, by itself, warrant a principal purpose test
Over two-thirds of survey respondents back the continuation of the UK’s digital services tax, research commissioned by the Fair Tax Foundation also found
Given the US/G7 pillar two deal, the OECD is in danger of being replaced by the UN as the leading global tax reform forum
Cinven’s latest investment follows its acquisition of a stake in Grant Thornton UK in December; in other news, a barrister listed by HMRC as a tax avoidance promoter has alleged harassment
CIT base narrowing measures remain more prevalent than increased CIT rates, the report also highlighted
ITR's parent company, LBG, will acquire The Lawyer, a leading news, intelligence and data-driven insight provider for the legal industry, from Centaur Media
KPMG UK’s Graeme Webster and KPMG Meijburg & Co’s Eduard Sporken outline the 20-year evolution of MAPAs, with DEMPE analyses becoming more prevalent and MAPA requirements growing stricter
Rishi Joshi, of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, warns of potential judicial overreach as assets are recharacterised to bypass a legislative exclusion
Only 2% of in-house survey respondents said they were ‘heavy’ users of AI for TP, Aibidia’s report also found
There was a ‘deeply embedded culture within PwC that routinely disregarded formal confidentiality obligations,’ the chairman of Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board said
Gift this article