Germany: Retroactive changes to RETT rules to apply from 2009

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Retroactive changes to RETT rules to apply from 2009

linn.jpg

braun.jpg

Alexander Linn


Thorsten Braun

On July 17 2015, Germany's Constitutional Court made public a decision, dated June 23, in which the court held that the 'secondary tax base' or 'special tax value' used in the calculation of the value of real property for German real estate transfer tax (RETT) purposes is unconstitutional. The secondary tax base is used as an alternative method of calculating the value of real property in cases where real property is not purchased directly, such as the direct or indirect transfer of shares in real estate holding entities, mergers, and so on. The secondary tax base generally results in values that are far lower than the fair market value of the real property, in many cases only reflecting 50% or less of the fair value of the property. The secondary tax base is calculated based on the actual annual rent or an alternative customary rent combined with certain multipliers and adjustments or, if rent is not available, on tax book values for land and buildings with relevant adjustments.

The court held that the calculation of RETT based on the secondary tax base violates the equality principle in article 3 of the German constitution because it deviates significantly and unintentionally from the market value of the real property. The court decided that the current version of the law cannot apply as from January 1 2009, and that parliament has until June 30 2016 to enact a new law that applies retroactively from January 1 2009.

The change in the law is expected to result in an increased RETT base closer to the fair market value used in direct purchases and, therefore, to an increased RETT in future transactions. Further, due to the retroactive effect of the decision, the new law could apply in cases where the RETT-triggering event already has occurred but the RETT base has not been finally assessed or where the RETT- triggering event has not been indicated or detected.

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de) and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

HMRC expects advisers to meet ever-higher compliance criteria. After 24 consecutive qualified audit opinions, many will ask whether HMRC should hold itself to the same standards
The purchase of Marosa represents the second major tax tech consolidation this week, raising questions of a broader industry trend
Peru’s approach to TP is increasingly at odds with OECD-style profitability policies, exposing multinational groups to asymmetric tax adjustments
Hany Elnaggar examines how the region's legacy economic substance regimes and the OECD's pillar two framework are converging on the same underlying test
The deals for TP Accurate and Intra Pricing Solutions will enhance Alphatax’s ability to support clients with the full TP lifecycle, the tax tech provider claimed
The DS Advocates partner discusses career reinvention, tax disputes and why advisory and litigation experience should complement one another
Lindsay Clayton’s arrival at Baker McKenzie continues the firm’s storied pursuit of ex-US government lawyers, a strategy reinforced by robust World Tax rankings
Shared transaction semantics, governed data and reusable ERP design may prove the most significant benefits of the UK's move to Peppol
As pillar two reshapes global tax competition, the UK faces a crucial challenge: how to remain attractive to multinationals without sacrificing tax revenues
Pillar two may be raising less than expected, but professor René Matteotti says the regime is still changing multinational tax behaviour
Gift this article