Cyprus: Introducing the new VAT appeal procedure

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cyprus: Introducing the new VAT appeal procedure

intl-updates-small.jpg

The Cyprus VAT Act has been amended in relation to the procedure to be followed for an appeal against an assessment issued by the tax department. This amendment entered into force on July 7 2017.

Specifically, the appeals should be submitted to the Tax Tribunal first and then to the Administrative Court, instead of to the minister of finance and the High Court.

The hierarchical appeal to the Tax Tribunal should be submitted within 45 days from the date of notification of the commissioner's decision to the applicant, for the following matters:

  • VAT imposed on the supply of goods and services, the intra-community acquisition of goods or importation of goods from outside the EU;

  • Input VAT that is deductible by a taxable person;

  • VAT assessment pursuant to the provisions of Articles 49 and 49A;

  • Issuance of VAT assessment pursuant to the provisions of Article 50;

  • Any guidance or additional guidance issued pursuant to paragraph 2 of Part I of Schedule One; and

  • Any decision taken pursuant to paragraph 1 of Part I of Schedule Four.

In relation to other VAT matters, such as registration or deregistration, VAT refund claims, etc., taxable persons can submit their appeals to the Commissioner of Taxation.

There are three conditions that need to be fulfilled in order for the Tax Tribunal to proceed with the examination of an appeal:

  1. Necessary documents and evidence to support the appeal must have been submitted;

  2. VAT returns must have been submitted and VAT payable must have been paid; and

  3. Payment of the undisputed VAT amount or a provision of a guarantee must be submitted to the Tax Tribunal.

The Tax Tribunal – following the examination of the hierarchical appeal – has the right to issue one of the following decisions within 12 months of the submission of the appeal:

  • Cancel or validate in whole or in part the commissioner's decision;

  • Amend the commissioner's decision;

  • Issue a new decision replacing the commissioner's decision; or

  • Refer the case to the commissioner, giving him instructions to take specific actions.

The decision of the Tax Tribunal must be issued within one year from the day the appeal is submitted. The taxpayer reserves the right to submit an appeal to the Administrative Court following the final decision of the Tax Tribunal.

damianou.jpg

Maria Damianou

Maria Damianou (maria.damianou@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Taxand

Tel: +357 22699222

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Despite the decline in profitability, the firm’s tax advisory business delivered a 3.4% revenue growth
Firms are making use of inventories and ample profit margins to avoid or absorb the initial impact of higher tariffs, an OECD report found
While UN proposals to shift airline taxation from a residence-based system to a source-state one are not set in stone, ex-British Airways CEO Willie Walsh warns they would increase costs and complexity
Von Wobeser y Sierra’s head of tax shares best practices for resolving tax controversy and touts his firm’s founding partner as an exemplar of legal practice
ITR concludes its analysis of World Tax’s rankings for 2026 by highlighting the firms that stood out most on a global scale
Experts from law firm Kennedys outline the key tax disputes trends set to define 2026, ranging from increased enforcement to continued tariff drama and AI usage
They also warned against an ‘unnecessary duplication of efforts’ in UN tax convention negotiations; in other news, White & Case has hired Freshfields’ former French tax head
Awards
Submit your nominations to this year's WIBL EMEA Awards by 16 February 2026
Defending loss situations in TP is not about denying the existence of losses but about showing, through proactive measures, that the losses reflect genuine commercial realities
Further empowerment of HMRC enforcement has been praised, but the pre-Budget OBR leak was described as ‘shambolic’
Gift this article