Spain: Should medics be taxed on invitations to medical seminars?

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Spain: Should medics be taxed on invitations to medical seminars?

intl-updates-small.jpg
blanco.jpg

Abigail Blanco

The Spanish Central Economic and Administrative Tribunal (TEAC) and State Tax Agency (AEAT) recently concluded that an invitation to a medical practitioner to attend a medical seminar means that they obtain income in kind.

According to the TEAC (in a decision dated April 4 2017) and AEAT (in a report on May 5 2017, which mirrored that decision) this income in kind may be earned income or income from an economic activity, according to whether the invitation is made to a hospital (which sends a representative on its behalf) or personally to the medic (whether self-employed or a hospital employee), respectively. In both cases, tax will have to be withheld from the income in kind by the entity that made the invitation.

There is no change to this conclusion, say both authorities, even if the invitations are geared towards the medic's training, because when the law exempts training from tax, it only does so for workers who are employees, and the initiative to provide the training must have come from the employer (who also must have funded it in full). The AEAT added that these expenses on attending seminars are not eligible for the relief for per diems (travel, meal and overnight expenses) either, because that relief may only be claimed by the recipients of earned income under an employment contract or a special-charter relationship for public workers.

It would appear that no consideration has been given to the definition of income in kind in the Personal Income Tax Law. This definition dictates that there will only be income in kind (and the law makes no distinction here between earned income and income from an activity) when it serves to satisfy strictly private purposes. When clearly, the training the medical practitioners receive by attending events, invited by pharmaceutical companies, directly benefits their medical practice, their medical expertise, their training in new treatments, products or innovations (…), besides contributing to maintaining the quality of the system (which we can safely say benefits the patient at the end of the line).

Both documents (the decision and the report) have caused considerable concern among both medics and pharmaceutical companies, in view of the effect this administrative standard may have on medical training; and have received a response from the Minister of Finance and Public Service dated May 29 2017, stating that "the government's intention to amend the Personal Income Tax Regulations to clarify in the legislation that the training courses of health personnel, funded by organisations, are not taxable for personal income tax purposes".

In July 2017, the Minister published its proposed amendment to the Personal Income Tax Regulations, which seems to be aimed at protecting employees working on medical centres who are authorised by their employers to attend the medical seminars. Surely, the temporary effect of the amendment, in case it is approved, will provoke discussions. Meanwhile, the AEAT's tax inspectors have already started work on these matters.

Abigail Blanco (abigail.blanco@garrigues.com)

Garrigues Madrid

Website: www.garriges.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article