Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher

Argentina: Argentine Tax Authorities accepts Supreme Court jurisprudence against Minimum Notional Income Tax constitutionality

11 July 2017

Email a friend
  • Please enter a maximum of 5 recipients. Use ; to separate more than one email address.

Ignacio Rodríguez

The Minimum Notional Income Tax (MNIT) is a sort of alternative minimum income tax and is payable by, among others, companies, partnerships and other business entities organised or established in Argentina (including branches of foreign companies, certain trusts, closed mutual funds, and so on).

The 1% tax is imposed annually on the assessed valuation for tax purposes of the assets at the end of each fiscal year, when it exceeds ARS$200,000 ($12,500). Banks and insurance companies are taxed only on 20% of such assets. Shares and other equity interests in companies or partnerships subject to MNIT are not included among the taxable assets, nor is the value corresponding to new depreciable movable assets other than motorcars during their first two years, or building constructions or improvements.

The income tax corresponding to the same fiscal year may be recognised as a payment on account of the MNIT, up to an amount which matches the latter. If a MNIT balance remains and has to be paid after subtracting the income tax, this excess may be carried forward and counted as a payment on account of the income tax exceeding the MNIT liability for any of the following 10 fiscal years.

As part of the tax reform executed by the new Argentine government in 2016, the MNIT is abolished as of 2019.

Back in February 2014, the Argentine Supreme Court of Justice issued an opinion in case law Editorial Perfil against the constitutionality of the Argentine Minimum Notional Income Tax (MNIT) due to the lack of taxable contributing capability where no gain has been determined regardless of whether the assets of the taxpayer have the potential and future ability of generating income, even when this latter criteria had also been raised in another ruling in 2010 (Hermitage).

This conclusion was based on the understanding that the MNIT consists of a notional taxable income not allowing proof to the contrary while when it can be duly sustained that there were no gains and rather losses – as in the case under analysis – that assumption of having capability to generate taxable income based on the size of the assets becomes invalid.

Thus, if the lack of taxable income is duly demonstrated the tax would become non-constitutional, according to the court's opinion.

The Argentine tax authorities just formally confirmed and accepted this opinion on May 18 2017 through the General Instruction No. 2 by stating that, in those cases where it can be proven that the taxpayer obtained losses (for both accounting and tax purposes), no notional income would exist for MNIT purposes. The Argentine tax authorities must also follow the General Instruction in those cases that are currently under discussion at an administrative or court level.

Moreover, Argentine taxpayers are able to obtain tax refunds of the amounts paid in those fiscal years not barred by statute of limitations (five years) where they obtained both accounting and tax losses. In order to obtain such refund, the taxpayer must formally start a refund process.

Ignacio Rodríguez (
Tel: +54 11 4850 4651

International Tax Review Profile

RT @SjoerdDouma: Dutch Supreme Court clarifies meaning of 'managed and controlled' in tax treaty Netherlands-Singapore

Jan 19 2018 04:42 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

RT @OECDtax: Read the public comments received on new #tax rules requiring disclosure of #CRS avoidance arrangements and offshore structure…

Jan 18 2018 04:39 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

RT @EU_Taxud: Press conference with @pierremoscovici today from 11.00h on the new system for VAT rates and on VAT system for SMEs. 🎥 Watch…

Jan 18 2018 09:56 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

RT @ddayen: Why must Americans become part-time accountants, just to follow the rules of society?

Jan 17 2018 02:30 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

RT @monicabhatia2: Singapore to automatically exchange financial account information with 61 states

Jan 17 2018 11:49 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Correspondents