Jeffrey Owens

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Jeffrey Owens

Academic

Jeffrey Owens

What do you do for the rest of your career after you step down from being the most visible tax official in the world? That’s what Jeffrey Owens had to think about when he left the OECD in February 2012. It is not like there was an obvious role for the first director of the organisation’s Centre for Tax Policy and Administration to move into.

Since he left the OECD behind, the Briton has carved out a portfolio career that gives him the opportunity to research international tax topics as director of the Global Tax Policy Centre at the Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law at the Vienna University of Business and Economics, be a distinguished scholar on the Global Governance Programme at the European University Institute in Florence, participate in organisations such as the International Tax and Investment Centre which creates opportunities for dialogue between officials, particularly in developing countries, taxpayers and practitioners, and take on a role as senior policy adviser to the vice chairman for tax at EY. He also advises governments around the world, particularly in Africa and the former Soviet Union.

It means he can still make an impact on the future course of international tax without having the responsibility to further the discussion and implement solutions, like he had when at the OECD. It also allows him to regain a position in the Global Tax 50 this year.

“I was determined to have a career that spanned academia, government and business,” Owens says. “I need to have one foot in each one. I’m very pleased to have the diversity as it gives me access to information and the opportunity to influence.”

His interests include cooperative compliance, which is practised in some countries such as the Netherlands, where it is known as horizontal monitoring, and broadly describes a dialogue between taxpayers and officials to prevent issues from becoming problems. “It would be easier to resolve BEPS (base erosion and profit shifting) problems if we had that.

He acknowledges that aggressive tax planning exists, but also refers to the aggressive behaviour of governments: “There is nothing wrong with that, but we need some rules of the game about what is acceptable and unacceptable.”

Owens is also interested in the broader interface between tax and governance, which countries such as the UK and Australia have characterised as tax in the boardroom. “I’ve always said that tax is too important to be left to tax directors,” he says.

The Global Tax 50 2013

« Previous

Michael Noonan

View the complete list

Next »

Rand Paul

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Shelley compares tax law to philosophy, shares best practices to get the most out of the working day, and reveals his alternate life as a teacher in Japan
Partners Sebastian Diehl and Martin Seevers reveal why the firm set up in London and discuss the city’s growing demand for German legal expertise
Tax advisers who aren’t alive to clients’ AI needs risk falling behind, even though the technology is not a miracle cure just yet
Awards
The ‘big four’ firm scooped over 60 honours at a lively ceremony held at The Londoner hotel, including both EMEA and APAC Tax Advisory Firm of the Year
The firms received fees for referring clients to the avoidance scheme, HMRC said; in other news, Freshfields’ former tax head has lost his fraud conviction appeal
ITR spoke to two US TP experts about the long-running dispute, with one arguing that the case highlights ‘weaknesses’ with the comparable uncontrolled transaction method
The new practice, which features former ‘big four’ experience, already has over 20 team members
Speakers from companies including Uber and Stripe told the inaugural AI in Tax Forum to brace for impending changes to how advisers work
Authors from Khaitan & Co dissect a ‘welcome’ ruling, which found that the mere existence of a tax benefit would not, by itself, warrant a principal purpose test
Over two-thirds of survey respondents back the continuation of the UK’s digital services tax, research commissioned by the Fair Tax Foundation also found
Gift this article