Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher

ATO outlines position on GST after High Court’s Qantas ruling

22 November 2012

Joe Dalton

The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) says the goods and services tax (GST) treatment of a transaction will not necessarily be affected if goods or services contemplated by a contract are never actually supplied, following the High Court’s recent ruling in the Qantas Airways case.

In its decision impact statement, the ATO said it still considers earlier cases concerning how to characterise supplies, such as Travelex Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation and Saga Holidays Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation, to be relevant where such characterisation is necessary to apply the statute in any particular case.

"There is nothing in the Qantas decision that would suggest that supplies need to be dissected into their component parts, or that the focus of GST should be on contractual rights and obligations instead of performance," the ATO statement said. "The commissioner considers that the mere failure of a ticketholder to utilise their rights to transport or of entry to an event would not have the effect of cancelling a supply that is made on sale of the ticket."

Qantas case

The case concerned what constituted a supply...



This article is locked content, available to current subscribers or trialists.

  • Current subscribers or trialists - Please log in to view this article in full.
  • New users - Please take a free 7 day trial.
  • Expired subscribers or trialists - Please subscribe to gain immediate full access.

If you think you've received this message in error, please contact your account manager, Nick Burroughs:
Email: nburroughs@euromoneyplc.com, Tel: +44 (0)207 779 8379

Subscribe now

Subscribe today to gain full access to International Tax Review.

Subscribe

Free trial

Take a free trial now and gain 7 days of full access to International Tax Review.

Free trial





International Tax Review Profile

.@EYNewsMexico #Tax perspectives on the Mexican energy reform http://t.co/F6mVYKFP3h. Part 1 is here: http://t.co/bfYby136mC

Oct 20 2014 04:00 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

If #Ireland goes for 6.25% for its knowledge development box, that would be aggressive. Lower than Neth and UK http://t.co/psg3SCNfiV

Oct 20 2014 02:17 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

#ff @AbelAdvisory @andrewmorreale @LAPFForum @maciejjesionow1

Oct 17 2014 09:29 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

Welcome to all our new followers @maciejjesionow1 @MadisonsMCR @AMRtaxCPA @gbskidmore @KateChaundy

Oct 17 2014 08:45 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

RT @AbelAdvisory: Abel is proud to be ranked again as one of the leading Dutch transfer pricing firms in @IntlTaxReview World TP 2015 http:…

Oct 16 2014 07:07 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Correspondents

After the Irish budget, what would make you more likely to put more substance into Ireland?