ATO outlines position on GST after High Court’s Qantas ruling
22 November 2012
The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) says the goods and services tax (GST) treatment of a transaction will not necessarily be affected if goods or services contemplated by a contract are never actually supplied, following the High Court’s recent ruling in the Qantas Airways case.
In its decision impact statement, the ATO said it still considers earlier cases concerning how to characterise supplies, such as Travelex Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation and Saga Holidays Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation, to be relevant where such characterisation is necessary to apply the statute in any particular case.
“There is nothing in the Qantas decision that would suggest that supplies need to be dissected into their component parts, or that the focus of GST should be on contractual rights and obligations instead of performance,” the ATO statement said. “The commissioner considers that the mere failure of a ticketholder to utilise their rights to transport or of entry to an event would not have the effect of cancelling a supply that is made on sale of the ticket.”
The case concerned what constituted a supply...
If you think you've received this message in error, please contact your account manager, Nick Burroughs:
This article is locked content, available to current subscribers or trialists.
- Current subscribers or trialists - Please log in to view this article in full.
- New users - Please take a free 7 day trial.
- Expired subscribers or trialists - Please subscribe to gain immediate full access
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org, Tel: +44 (0)207 779 8379
Subscribe today to gain full access to International Tax Review.