ECJ clarifies rules on third country investments in FII GLO decision
21 November 2012
The European Court of Justice’s (ECJ) second judgment in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation (FII GLO) clarifies when EU taxpayers can rely on free movement of capital for outward investments into non-EU jurisdictions. It also highlights the need for an answer regarding inward investment from non-EU taxpayers.
Philippe Freund (pictured
below), of Dorsey & Whitney, who instructed the claimants
in the case, analyses the implications for taxpayers.
The November 13 judgment addressed a number of
issues arising out of the ECJ's previous ruling in December 2006.
In its first judgment (FII
1 (C-446/04)) the court was asked to answer a large number
of preliminary questions dealing with the EU law compatibility
of certain features of the UK's advance corporation tax and
dividend tax legislation.
When the matter came back before
the UK courts it became clear that a number of further
questions arising out of the ECJ's judgment would need to be
referred back to the ECJ.
The UK High Court referred five questions back to the ECJ in
December 2010. Three questions concerned the advance
corporation tax system which was abolished in 1999. The answers
to those questions are unlikely to be of...
This article is locked content, available to current subscribers or triallists.
- Current subscribers or trialists - Please log in to view this article in full.
- New users - Please take a free 7 day trial.
- Expired subscribers or trialists - Please subscribe to gain immediate full access.
If you think you've received this message in error, please contact your account manager, Nick Burroughs:
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org, Tel: +44 (0)207 779 8379
Subscribe today to gain full access to International Tax Review.
Take a free trial now and gain 7 days of full access to International Tax Review.