International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


This law firm has not supplied any contact details or supplementary information for this country or region. For more information about profiling options please contact Prin Shasiharan.
2027 Edition
Indirect tax
31 firms ranked
View full list

Tier 1

Baker McKenzie
6 practice areas
View full profile
Deloitte
7 practice areas
View profile
EY
7 practice areas
View profile
KPMG
7 practice areas
View profile
PwC
7 practice areas
View profile

Tier 2

Alvarez & Marsal
6 practice areas
View profile
Andersen
2 practice areas
View profile
Ashurst Perkins Coie
4 practice areas
View profile
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
5 practice areas
View profile
Clifford Chance
6 practice areas
View profile
DLA Piper
6 practice areas
View profile
Eversheds Sutherland
5 practice areas
View profile
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher
5 practice areas
View profile
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
5 practice areas
View profile
Pinsent Masons
5 practice areas
View profile

Tier 3

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
6 practice areas
View profile
Mishcon de Reya
4 practice areas
View profile
Norton Rose Fulbright
4 practice areas
View profile
Simmons & Simmons
6 practice areas
View profile

Tier 4

CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang
4 practice areas
View profile
Grant Thornton
6 practice areas
View profile

Other notable

A&O Shearman
5 practice areas
View profile
Macfarlanes
4 practice areas
View profile
Mayer Brown
3 practice areas
View profile
McDermott Will & Schulte
5 practice areas
View profile
Osborne Clarke
2 practice areas
View profile
Paul Hastings
3 practice areas
View profile
Ryan View profile
Shoosmiths View profile
Stewarts Law
3 practice areas
View profile
Vistra
2 practice areas
View full profile
Tax controversy
40 firms ranked
View full list

Tier 1

Baker McKenzie
6 practice areas
View full profile
DLA Piper
6 practice areas
View profile
Deloitte
7 practice areas
View profile
EY
7 practice areas
View profile
Freshfields
5 practice areas
View profile
Slaughter and May
5 practice areas
View profile

Tier 2

A&O Shearman
5 practice areas
View profile
Ashurst Perkins Coie
4 practice areas
View profile
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
5 practice areas
View profile
Eversheds Sutherland
5 practice areas
View profile
Fieldfisher
3 practice areas
View profile
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
5 practice areas
View profile
Joseph Hague Aaronson
3 practice areas
View profile
KPMG
7 practice areas
View profile
Macfarlanes
4 practice areas
View profile
Pinsent Masons
5 practice areas
View profile
PwC
7 practice areas
View profile
Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom
4 practice areas
View profile
Stewarts Law
3 practice areas
View profile
Temple Tax Chambers
5 practice areas
View profile

Tier 3

1 Crown Office Row
2 practice areas
View profile
11 New Square
3 practice areas
View profile
39 Essex Chambers
3 practice areas
View profile
Alvarez & Marsal
6 practice areas
View profile
Mishcon de Reya
4 practice areas
View profile
Pump Court Tax Chambers
3 practice areas
View profile
Reynolds Porter Chamberlain
5 practice areas
View profile
Simmons & Simmons
6 practice areas
View profile

Other notable

ADE Tax
3 practice areas
View profile
Addleshaw Goddard
2 practice areas
View profile
Andersen
2 practice areas
View profile
BDO
3 practice areas
View profile
Brown Rudnick
2 practice areas
View profile
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
5 practice areas
View profile
Goodwin Procter
5 practice areas
View profile
Kirkland & Ellis
5 practice areas
View profile
McDermott Will & Schulte
5 practice areas
View profile
Menzies View profile
Osborne Clarke
2 practice areas
View profile
Shoosmiths View profile
11 results11 results
The Court of Appeal ruling clarifies that treaty benefits are not abusive where transactions are commercially driven, providing greater certainty on “main purpose” anti-avoidance tests
Legal battles involving the IRS, HMRC and ATO feature as companies have been ordered to pay vast sums
The UK Upper Tribunal’s pragmatic approach to anti-abuse provisions will be welcomed by the secondary debt market, say Matthew Greene and Guy Bud of Stewarts
Sponsored

Sponsored

should have bg #f6f8fb but is leaving an artifact