The UN versus the OECD: It’s not a football match

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The UN versus the OECD: It’s not a football match

Both the OECD and the UN are working to reform international tax rules, one representing the developed world; the other the developing nations. But, who will come out on top?

football150.jpg

This is the question many non-government organisations (NGO) are asking but, in a panel called A New World Order at the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise’s international tax conference in Stockholm yesterday, Jeffrey Owens, director of the Centre for Tax Policy and Administration at the OECD, and Michael Lennard, chief of International Tax Cooperation and Trade Financing at the UN, said it is not as simple as that.

None of the other panellists, which included Indian and Brazilian tax officials and practitioners and executives active in OECD’s tax work, disputed this.

“They [NGOs] only say these things for the headlines,” Owens said.

Owens said the OECD is interested in the Brics (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) and other developing nations because this is where the growth is and the number of multinational enterprises in the Brics countries is increasing.

Lennard said the UN is trying to help developing countries to incorporate and work with the OECD transfer pricing guidelines.

“But we have to remember that the transfer pricing rules were developed by a small group of countries quite a while ago,” he added.

Both Owens and Lennard emphasised the work that the OECD and the UN share

“It would be a shame if, because of some of the pressure from NGOs, that [relationship] would go away,” Owens said.

The panel, which also included Chris Lenon, chairman of the tax advisory committee of the OECD’s Business and Industry Committee (BIAC), Philip Baker QC of Gray’s Inn Tax Chambers in London, Anita Kapur of the Indian Revenue Service and Fernando Mombelli of the Brazilian Federal Revenue, was chaired by Krister Andersson, the head of the tax policy group of Business Europe. They highlighted how developing nations are gaining more prominence in tax policy development and economic affairs.

“While there is a lot of debate about what will be the new world order, the OECD versus the UN is not a football match,” Baker said.



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The private equity-backed deal hands Grant Thornton immediate and impressive US scale, but World Tax data suggests the firm still has work to do to gain recognition
From Instagram content to £100m transactions, the founder of Thomas & Co International discusses building a modern tax and accounting firm for business founders
Growing GAAR scrutiny is driving taxpayers to look beyond legal form and demonstrate the commercial rationale underpinning tax-efficient structures
Pillar two has been clients’ ‘biggest headache’ but also a driver of growth for MHA, which believes it has the edge over its big four rivals
Public country-by-country reporting is exposing multinational tax data to investors, journalists and competitors, creating fresh risks for businesses
Pillar two compliance is creating unprecedented data demands for multinational tax departments, making closer collaboration with FP&A teams essential for accurate reporting and audit readiness
Among the arrivals is Andrew Howell, who leaves scandal-hit PwC Australia after representing PepsiCo in a high-profile TP dispute
ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
Gift this article