THE IMPORTANCE OF TAX-RELATED CLAUSES IN CONTRACTS BETWEEN SPANISH RESIDENTS AND NON RESIDENTS

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

THE IMPORTANCE OF TAX-RELATED CLAUSES IN CONTRACTS BETWEEN SPANISH RESIDENTS AND NON RESIDENTS

Spanish tax legislation has been always sensitive to the potential risk that non-resident (non-established) taxpayers deriving income from Spanish sources do not comply voluntarily with their tax obligations.

However, the Spanish system does not impose on resident companies and individuals making payments to non-resident taxpayers a general obligation to withhold the related taxes.

In Spain there is a general system of withholdings (mainly applicable to personal income and capital income) that applies irrespective of the nature (as resident or non resident) of the party obtaining the income. Therefore, this withholding mechanism does not apply to all types of income and does not specifically regulate resident/non resident tax relationships. On the contrary, Spanish legislation simply establishes a system of joint derivation of responsibility which implies that the aforementioned Spanish residents would be jointly liable for the taxes of the non-resident to which the payment is made.

The major problem arises in the area of service contracts signed between residents and non residents in Spain. Here, typically, the Spanish payer has no legal authorization to withhold any amount for the non-resident tax, but is simply considered jointly liable for the taxes of the non-resident party.

If any withholding is made, the non-resident party could argue that the contract has been breached since the consideration agreed upon is not fully paid. But if not, the Spanish resident party would be at the mercy of the non resident and would be liable if the non resident did not pay the related tax.

Some controversies in this field have made the parties more sensitive to the need to properly cover this aspect of the transaction in the related contract. A (tax) clause, properly drafted, in which the parties establish their agreement to a withholding, or guarantee, or any other mechanism, is in many situations highly advisable.

José Palacios

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Among the arrivals is Andrew Howell, who leaves scandal-hit PwC Australia after representing PepsiCo in a high-profile TP dispute
ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
Despite the shortfall, effective tax rates of multinationals have seen a ‘statistically significant rise’
After joining Milbank from Akin Gump, the fund tax specialist discusses sponsor demand, practice building, and the tax challenges facing asset managers
Gift this article