French tax authorities issue guidelines on avoir fiscal rate for tax credits to non-residents

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


French tax authorities issue guidelines on avoir fiscal rate for tax credits to non-residents

The French tax authorities have issued new guidelines (Instruction 4 J-1-02, January 3 2002) on the provisions of the Finance Bill 2001 that reduced the rate of the avoir fiscal for tax credits used in 2001 and 2002. In particular, the authorities comment on these provisions with regard to the situation of non-French residents.

It is important to note that the avoir fiscal may be transferred to a non-French resident receiving a dividend from a French company only if the applicable international tax treaty provides for such a transfer. As far as the amount of the avoir fiscal is concerned, two categories of companies are distinguished under the new guidelines:

  • companies that meet the requirements set for the participation exemption regime if they were French resident companies; and

  • companies that do not meet these requirements.

The French Finance Bill 2001 amended the participation exemption regime insofar as the Ffr150 million ($20 million) threshold was eliminated and the 10% threshold was reduced to 5%. In addition to holding at least 5% of the share capital of the French distributing company, companies have to subscribe to the French shares when they are issued or commit themselves to holding them for at least two years.

With regard to non-French companies that would meet the requirements set for the participation exemption regime if they were French resident companies, they are entitled to an avoir fiscal equal to 50% of the amount of the received dividends, subject to the deduction of the withholding tax provided by the applicable tax treaty. Contrary to their former position, the French tax authorities now consider that non-French companies are entitled to the entire transfer of the avoir fiscal at the rate of 50% even if they have not held the shares of the French distributing company for two years.

This new position applies with regard to avoirs fiscaux effectively reimbursed from January 15 2001 onwards, provided non-French companies commit themselves to holding their 5% participation for at least two years and give the French tax authorities the name of a tax representative who will be liable for the reimbursement of the excess fraction of the avoir fiscal received, should they fail to hold their 5% participation for two years. In practice, this provision mostly applies to parent companies owning between 5% and 10% in the subsidiary. As a matter of fact, most tax treaties do not entitle companies owning 10% or more to any transfer of avoir fiscal.

As for non-French companies that would not meet the requirements set for the participation exemption, they are entitled to an avoir fiscal equal to 25% or 15% of the dividends – subject to the deduction of the withholding tax provided by the applicable tax treaty – provided these avoirs fiscaux are used or effectively reimbursed respectively in 2001 or from January 1 2002 onwards.

If the French distributing company had to pay equalization tax (précompte) on the distributed dividend, the 25% or 15% avoir fiscal attached is increased by an amount equal to respectively 50% or 70% of the equalization tax paid on each dividend by the French distributing company. However, the portion of the equalization tax for the payment of which tax credits were used, ie for which no payment was made, and the portion of equalization tax due as a result of a distribution paid from the long-term capital gain reserve, are not taken into account to increase the amount of the avoir fiscal.

This increase, computed on the basis of the equalization tax paid by the French distributing company, is treated as part of the avoir fiscal for the application of tax treaties.

Specific provisions are provided for pension funds. Japanese pension funds benefit from the transfer of an avoir fiscal equal to 15% of the distributed dividends. US and Dutch pension funds benefit from the transfer of an avoir fiscal equal to 30/85 of the applicable avoir fiscal rate, reduced by the 15% withholding tax rate, ie for a dividend of 100 paid in 2000, the refund is equal to 7.5 in 2001, and is equal to 4.5 in 2002 for a dividend paid in 2001. Austrian or English pension funds benefit from the transfer of an avoir fiscal equal to 25% in 2001 and 15% in 2002, on which the 15% withholding tax is levied.

Robert Tarika

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As funds work becomes more complex, Proskauer is betting that embedded tax expertise can strengthen its wider offering
The recently founded AI platform stands out in a crowded marketplace thanks to a compelling vision and friends in the right places
Advisers expect consumption tax reform to stay on course, but debt pressures could push the government towards tougher enforcement and incentive reviews
The firm demonstrated its sweet spot of litigation with an international twist with the recent win for the Danish tax authority…but it’s not a tax case
The recently formed firm has taken a break from hiring EY talent to expand its transactional tax and tax technology capabilities
The AI platform, founded last year by two school friends, is partnering with challenger firms like Unity Advisory and A&M Tax to launch its own assault on the AI tax market
Not only has Aurtus received recognition from ITR in the past, but its founder was both a partner at KPMG and co-founder of Dhruva Advisors
Clients care more about considered counsel than rapid media-friendly soundbites, says Matthew Gilleard, associate director at Infinite
It was also a memorable night for Galicia, KPMG, Skadden and Pinheiro Neto, all of which scooped major awards at a gala ceremony in New York
The former Deloitte UK CEO earned a 45% raise in a year when 1,000 staff reportedly lost their jobs – and the pay gap is only getting bigger
Gift this article