Norwegian update: Refunds for withholding tax on dividends

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Norwegian update: Refunds for withholding tax on dividends

The Norwegian parliament passed a new tax reform in December 2004

The Norwegian parliament passed a new tax reform in December 2004. A central part of the reform is the so-called "Exemption Model", that is, granting most corporate shareholders exemption from taxes on gains and dividends on shares, including the withholding tax on dividends.

All corporate shareholders within the European Economic Area (EEA = EU countries + Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway) are exempt. Other foreign shareholders in Norwegian stocks are not exempt.

With respect to dividend distributions the new rules are in force from January 1 2004. Many foreign corporations within the EEA hold shares in Norwegian companies, for example in companies listed on the Norwegian stock exchange. Thus, some of these shareholders have received dividends during 2004 and have paid withholding tax. If proper documentation is provided for, the foreign shareholder may apply for a refund in accordance with the ordinary procedures, administered by the Central Office - Foreign Tax Affairs and the local tax offices.

Refund also for previous years?

As Norway has signed the EEA Agreement in 1994 the four freedoms set out in the EU Treaty must be respected. The EFTA court ruled in November 2004 that withholding tax on dividends to shareholders resident in the EEA is not in accordance with the EEA Agreement and the Norwegian EEA Act, since Norwegian shareholders has not been liable to tax on dividends from Norwegian companies (since 1992). The court ruling should apply both to corporate and natural persons holding Norwegian shares.

However, a relevant question is if it is too late to claim reassessments. For the income year 2003 it should be clear that a case might be tried before a court if a writ of summons is filed no later than March 2005. If a shareholder has paid a considerable amount of Norwegian withholding tax in the years between 1994 and 2003, the shareholder should contact a tax adviser in Norway to get an evaluation of the chances of a reassessment and repayment.

Hans Olav Hemnes (hans.o.hemnes@no.pwc.com) and Bjørn Slåtta (bjorn.slaatta@no.pwc.com), Oslo

ITR Week welcomes your feedback on this or any other story. Please email the author with your comments. Letters may be published online.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

HMRC expects advisers to meet ever-higher compliance criteria. After 24 consecutive qualified audit opinions, many will ask whether HMRC should hold itself to the same standards
The purchase of Marosa represents the second major tax tech consolidation this week, raising questions of a broader industry trend
Peru’s approach to TP is increasingly at odds with OECD-style profitability policies, exposing multinational groups to asymmetric tax adjustments
Hany Elnaggar examines how the region's legacy economic substance regimes and the OECD's pillar two framework are converging on the same underlying test
The deals for TP Accurate and Intra Pricing Solutions will enhance Alphatax’s ability to support clients with the full TP lifecycle, the tax tech provider claimed
The DS Advocates partner discusses career reinvention, tax disputes and why advisory and litigation experience should complement one another
Lindsay Clayton’s arrival at Baker McKenzie continues the firm’s storied pursuit of ex-US government lawyers, a strategy reinforced by robust World Tax rankings
Shared transaction semantics, governed data and reusable ERP design may prove the most significant benefits of the UK's move to Peppol
As pillar two reshapes global tax competition, the UK faces a crucial challenge: how to remain attractive to multinationals without sacrificing tax revenues
Pillar two may be raising less than expected, but professor René Matteotti says the regime is still changing multinational tax behaviour
Gift this article