Netherlands to overhaul corporate tax

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Netherlands to overhaul corporate tax

The government of the Netherlands has proposed sweeping tax changes that would lower the country's corporate tax rate and align its international tax rules more closely with EU law

The government of the Netherlands has proposed sweeping tax changes that would lower the country's corporate tax rate and align its international tax rules more closely with EU law.

The proposals, released as a white paper on April 29, would reduce the corporate tax rate from 31.5% to 26.9% and extend loss-relief rules to countries outside the Netherlands but within the EU. The white paper, entitled Working towards profits, is designed to boost the competitiveness of the Dutch international corporate tax system and help protect it from challenges by the European Court of Justice.

An important restriction is that the proposals must be revenue-neutral. Their cost will be offset by limiting the time allowed for the carryover of tax losses, abolishing the deductibility of start-up losses and liquidation losses, abolishing the equalization reserve for life insurers and abolishing the depreciation of real property where its fair market value equals or exceeds the tax book value.

"The proposed changes to international loss relief rules seem watertight [from ECJ challenges] but it depends on the details of how they are legislated," said Eelco van der Stok, a Dutch tax partner at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer in London. "If there are any doubts, they will probably ask the European Commission in advance to make sure."

Pieter Elias, a Dutch tax partner at NautaDutilh in London, said that the attitude of the government in the Netherlands regarding EU law had changed. "Recently they have been very proactive but that has not always been the case in the past," he said. "They got burnt by the Bosal case and that cost them a lot of money. Now they are thinking that it is better to be cautious and not wait to get trapped by new case law."

The white paper contains only brief remarks or notes that further study is required on some of the tax-reform measures. Parliament will now debate the measures before introducing a bill later this year. The changes are scheduled to take effect from January 1 2007.

ITR Week welcomes your feedback on this or any other story. Please email the author with your comments. Letters may be published online.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In a seminal development for big law, the 95-year-old firm is set to cease operations after a series of high-profile partner departures
UK Chancellor John Healey extended a VAT cut, suspended tariffs, increased a bank surcharge and vowed to increase funding for HMRC
Kristine Riisberg warned that TP decisions can determine top-up tax exposure under pillar two, while global consensus over the rules remains unsettled
Both Germany’s NIS2 and the EU AI Act now determine whether a tax function can meet its obligations – and both can make management personally accountable
Originators, loan purchasers and securitisation vehicles may need to revisit servicing agreements and pricing after a key judgment narrowed the VAT credit management exemption
Opening doors for existing talent within Baker McKenzie and a desire for enhanced legal capabilities informed Ricardo Perera’s switch from KPMG
Boaz Goren’s move to the upstart PE-backed firm takes the number of senior UK tax professionals who have left EY this year to 13
The allegations against Deloitte Cyprus raise uncomfortable questions about how far the big four can distance themselves from misconduct at member firms
The UAE accounted for most Middle East promotions and new rankings, as A&M Tax, Baker McKenzie, Dhruva Consultants and DLA Piper breached the top tier
Spanish-headquartered multinationals lead on reporting quality, while US and Swiss groups lag in the Fair Tax Foundation’s expanded analysis
Gift this article