Canada to provide welcome relief to foreign investors

Canada to provide welcome relief to foreign investors

bailey.jpg
sprio.jpg

Bryan Bailey

 

Andrew Spiro

In delivering its budget on March 4 2010, the Canadian federal government announced a significant liberalisation of Canadian tax laws applicable to non-resident investors in Canadian businesses.

Non-resident investors are taxable in Canada on gains realised from dispositions of "taxable Canadian property" (TCP), subject to treaty protection. They are also generally required to obtain a "section 116 clearance certificate" from the Canadian tax authorities in connection with dispositions of TCP. The process of obtaining a clearance certificate (even for treaty-exempt dispositions) typically takes many months, and has been a major irritant in many cross-border transactions. A purchaser will typically withhold 25% of the purchase price until a certificate is obtained.

Effective for dispositions after March 4 2010, the budget proposes to dramatically narrow the definition of TCP. In particular, it proposes to exclude shares of corporations unless the shares are real property interests. (Previously, all shares of private Canadian corporations were TCP). A share will generally not be a real property interest unless, at any time in the 60 month period preceding the disposition, it derives more than 50% of its value from Canadian real or resource property. This proposal is intended to bring Canada's domestic tax rules in line with its tax treaties, which generally exempt gains on share dispositions from Canadian tax unless the shares derive their value principally from Canadian real property.

The budget proposal, which is now contained in draft legislation, is welcome news. Non-resident investors (even those in non-treaty jurisdictions) will not be subject to tax on dispositions of Canadian shares, or be faced with burdensome "section 116" compliance or withholding obligations, unless the shares are real property interests. This will be particularly welcome to foreign private equity funds, and may in some cases eliminate the need for third country "blocker" structures when investing in Canadian businesses.

Bryan Bailey (bryan.bailey@blakes.com) and Andrew Spiro (andrew.spiro@blakes.com)

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Ethics seems to be playing a subservient role to an entitlement culture borne out of a pervasive ‘revenue at all costs’ mentality at the big four
Historical World Tax data suggests the ‘largest law firm merger in history’ may not pose a serious threat to the world's leading tax practices
The repeal of Libya’s statute of limitations and tougher enforcement leave taxpayers navigating a high-stakes choice between conciliation and litigation
All the tax partners elevated across the UK, US and Singapore were private client specialists, continuing a market trend of intense investment and competition
Rolf van de Velde, dubbed ‘an expert chosen by experts’, is tasked with scaling Reptune’s self-service compliance offering
The newly combined firm brings together more than 3,500 practitioners across 52 offices, with flagship hubs in Seattle, London, Sydney and New York.
Building a transparent culture, prioritising internal promotions and being different from the big four are all key features of A&M Tax’s ambitious plans for India
ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2026 showed why harmonisation remains elusive, advisers must raise their game, and ‘everyone’s data is rubbish’
The firm’s board has reportedly asked Kevin Burrowes to continue until 2028 as the KPMG Australia scandal raises expectations of regulatory reform
A former Deloitte partner will lead the firm’s latest geographic expansion; in other news, Baker McKenzie added six tax lawyers to its partnership
Gift this article