Russia: New Russian transfer pricing rules for corresponding adjustments

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Russia: New Russian transfer pricing rules for corresponding adjustments

lemetyuynen.jpg

kasperovich.jpg

Ilarion Lemetyuynen


Pavel Kasperovich

On June 8 2015, the President of the Russian Federation signed Federal Law No. 150-FZ, which introduced, inter alia, amendments to the Tax Code of the Russian Federation (RF Tax Code) regarding corresponding adjustments. Before that, corresponding adjustments could be performed based only on the decisions of the Russian tax authorities within transfer pricing audits. The new law not only clarifies the procedure by which the corresponding adjustments are to be made (based on the Russian tax authorities' decisions), but also allows Russian taxpayers to perform voluntary corresponding adjustments.

These amendments are particularly relevant given:

  • Existing legislation is ambiguous, and there is a distinct lack of experience regarding the application of corresponding adjustments in Russia;

  • It is anticipated that the Russian tax authorities will increase the number of companies included in the transfer pricing audit plan for 2013–2014; and

  • The Russian Parliament is thinking about amending current transfer pricing legislation in two to three years' time, including stipulating that transfer pricing adjustments performed by the Russian tax authorities must be based on a median of the arm's-length range. However, based on the current draft law, if voluntary adjustments have been made, they will be allowed to adjust prices/profitability to the lower/upper end of the arm's-length range).

Therefore, it is important for Russian taxpayers to understand which instruments they have available to mitigate their Russian transfer pricing risks.

Clarifying corresponding adjustments made on the basis of tax authority decisions

The law sets out in more detail the procedure for performing corresponding adjustments based on the decisions of the tax authorities in transfer pricing audits.

The law provides that only a notice from the Federal Tax Service of Russia is required to perform an adjustment. This notice should be sent to a taxpayer within a month from the date when the Russian tax authorities' decision is implemented, unless there are breaches in the stipulated procedure. If this notice is not sent, then penalties are introduced against the Russian tax authorities.

Additionally, some other minor issues are clarified by the law (for example, in which tax return the corresponding adjustment shall be reflected, and so on).

Voluntary corresponding adjustments

Based on the law, Russian taxpayers may now apply corresponding adjustments voluntarily in domestic transactions if their counterparty independently adjusted prices in accordance with the arm's-length principle and increased the tax base in its Russian tax return.

To substantiate the adjustment, it will be necessary to submit documents confirming that the counterparty adjusted the tax base and the tax amounts (losses), provide clarifications on the transaction in respect of which the adjustment was performed, and also confirm that the counterparty executed the tax payment obligation that arose as a result of the adjustment.

The aforementioned documents should be received directly from the counterparty. The Federal Tax Service does not submit its own corresponding data.

Important issues to consider

Despite the above positive developments there are still a lot of issues to be considered:

  • Issues with local tax authorities: The corresponding adjustments are performed at the location of the taxpayer, whereas the transfer pricing issues are resolved at the federal level. Accordingly, difficulties may arise when discussing the corresponding adjustments with the local tax authorities if they lead to a decrease in the taxes they collect;

  • Not possible to decrease your tax base in Russia: It is only possible to reduce the tax base when the other company – a Russian taxpayer – increases its tax base by the same amount. As a general rule, taxpayers may not adjust prices unilaterally if this results in an understatement of their tax liabilities; and

  • Taxpayers entitled to corresponding adjustments: The mechanism is only available for taxpayers which are Russian organisations. Branches of foreign companies may not benefit from corresponding adjustments.

The aforementioned amendments are a great sign for Russian taxpayers that more instruments are being made available to them to solve their transfer pricing issues in Russia. Please note that the corresponding adjustments mechanism is available only for domestic transactions. Unfortunately, Russian subsidiaries of foreign corporations are still unable to perform voluntary downward transfer pricing adjustments, and complex solutions are still required to design sustainable transfer pricing models in cross-border transactions.

Ilarion Lemetyuynen (ilemetyuynen@kpmg.ru) and Pavel Kasperovich (pkasperovich@kpmg.ru)

KPMG in Russia and the CIS

Tel: +7 (495) 937 44 44 and +7 (495) 937 44 44

Website: www.kpmg.ru

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
Sponsored by Deloitte
Sameer Nurmohamed, partner, Deloitte Legal Canada
Sponsored by Deloitte
George Ankomah, partner, Tax & Regulatory Services, Deloitte Africa (Ghana)
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
The big four spin-off firm becomes Taxand’s second UK member; in other news, Haynes Boone launched a UK tax practice
Sponsored by Deloitte Luxembourg
Jean-Michel Henry and Mona El-Begawi of Deloitte Luxembourg examine the complexities created by timing differences in Luxembourg, EU, and OECD tax regimes
Stephanie Pantelidaki’s economic expertise will give Norton Rose Fulbright’s other teams ‘extra firepower,’ she says
Sponsored by MFA Legal & Tech
Samuel Fernandes de Almeida of MFA Legal & Tech assesses whether Portugal’s 7.5% surcharge on non-residents aligns with the EU’s free movement of capital principle and passes the proportionality test
Sponsored by McCarthy Tétrault
Senior McCarthy Tétrault tax practitioners highlight significant updates and implications for multinationals as Canada’s transfer pricing rules become more closely aligned with OECD guidance
Gift this article