The European Commission takes legal action against Sweden

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


The European Commission takes legal action against Sweden

Sponsored by

2025ForvisMazars.png

Global mobility | 23 June 2025

The European Commission has decided to take legal action against Sweden at the EU Court of Justice. The reason? Since 2021, Swedish tax legislation has required clients to withhold 30% preliminary tax when paying foreign contractors for work performed in Sweden – if the entrepreneur (whether an individual or a company) is not approved for F-tax by the Swedish Tax Agency.

According to the Commission, the requirement for F-tax approval violates the EU’s fundamental principle of freedom to provide services (see here). The criticism concerns the fact that generally, foreign contractors without a permanent establishment in Sweden are not liable to pay tax in Sweden, but still have parts of their compensation frozen while awaiting the Tax Agency’s assessment of the foreign contractors’ tax liability. A refund can potentially take up to two years.

The relatively new legislation creates liquidity issues as well as high administrative barriers for contractors from other EU or EEA countries to operate in the Swedish market, according to the Commission. One consequence of being approved for F-tax is that the foreign contractor must annually provide specific information to the Tax Agency. This information forms the basis for the Tax Agency’s assessment of whether the company has a permanent establishment – and therefore whether it is liable to pay tax in Sweden.

Just weeks before the European Commission referred Sweden to the EU Court of Justice, the Swedish government introduced a bill proposing stricter rules for the approval and revocation of F-tax status. Under the proposal, an application for F-tax would be denied – and an existing approval could be revoked – if the applicant or holder fails to comply with an order to provide specific information, or submits or endorses information so deficient that it is clearly inadequate for assessing tax liability under the Income Tax Act. The proposed bill aims to enhance compliance and improve the integrity of tax assessments.

In light of the Commission’s position, we anticipate that the rules may ultimately revert to their previous form. Should that happen, Swedish businesses would once again bear the responsibility of independently determining the tax liability of the payee. Forvis Mazars in Sweden is closely monitoring developments and will provide updates when the EU Court of Justice has reviewed the matter. In the meantime, companies that hire foreign contractors for work performed on site in Sweden, should remain vigilant about whether F-tax approval is missing. If no withholding has been made in such cases, and tax liability in Sweden is later established, the payer may be jointly liable for the unpaid tax.

Feel free to contact us at Forvis Mazars Sweden with any questions. We can assist with both F-tax registrations for foreign companies and applications for exemption from the obligation to make tax withholdings. You can also consult us regarding the presence of a permanent establishment or the obligation to provide Specific information for F-tax approved foreign entrepreneurs or following an order from the Swedish Tax Agency.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It was also a memorable night for Galicia, KPMG, Skadden and Pinheiro Neto, all of which scooped major awards at a gala ceremony in New York
The former Deloitte UK CEO earned a 45% raise in a year when 1,000 staff reportedly lost their jobs – and the pay gap is only getting bigger
In a seminal development for big law, the 95-year-old firm is set to cease operations after a series of high-profile partner departures
UK Chancellor John Healey extended a VAT cut, suspended tariffs, increased a bank surcharge and vowed to increase funding for HMRC
Kristine Riisberg warned that TP decisions can determine top-up tax exposure under pillar two, while global consensus over the rules remains unsettled
Both Germany’s NIS2 and the EU AI Act now determine whether a tax function can meet its obligations – and both can make management personally accountable
Originators, loan purchasers and securitisation vehicles may need to revisit servicing agreements and pricing after a key judgment narrowed the VAT credit management exemption
Opening doors for existing talent within Baker McKenzie and a desire for enhanced legal capabilities informed Ricardo Perera’s switch from KPMG
Boaz Goren’s move to the upstart PE-backed firm takes the number of senior UK tax professionals who have left EY this year to 13
The allegations against Deloitte Cyprus raise uncomfortable questions about how far the big four can distance themselves from misconduct at member firms
Gift this article