Deloitte - Americas Regional Indirect Tax Interview (ii)

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Deloitte - Americas Regional Indirect Tax Interview (ii)

Sponsored by

21DeloitteGlobal.png

Interview with Kirsten Gulotta, US Transaction Tax Leader, Deloitte Tax LLP

1103.png

1103.jpeg

Interview with Kirsten Gulotta, US Transaction Tax Leader, Deloitte Tax LLP

 

1. What is the most significant change to your region/jurisdiction’s tax legislation or regulations in the past 12 months?

The most significant changes are evolving state and local standards regarding the classification and taxability of digital goods and gross receipts taxes. Specifically, there have been numerous jurisdictions that have proposed and implemented Digital Ad Taxes, and a number of challenges have been raised. Furthermore, there has been a recent trend of jurisdictions focusing on gross receipts taxes to raise state and city revenues. These new gross receipts taxes are in addition to the already well-established gross receipts-based taxes.

2. What has been the most significant impact of that change?

The aforementioned changes have brought uncertainty around tax obligations and potential exposures for taxpayers. For example, there are definitional issues regarding what would constitute a digital advertising service. There are also sourcing issues, where in some instances, apportionment could be based on a number of users (device-based) and in other instances based on how much revenue is derived within a particular state, creating potential duplicate taxation. In addition, there is inconsistency in how the location of devices can be determined. Options include but are not limited to internet protocol, geological data, device registration, cookies, or industry standard metrics.

3. How do you anticipate that change impacting your work and the market moving forwards?

It will likely lead to additional co-sourcing and outsourcing of indirect tax compliance and additional consulting around sourcing, nexus, classification, and taxability. Navigating proposed and recently implemented taxes such as Digital Ad Taxes and Gross Receipts Taxes is challenging, especially when keeping up with the challenges raised and the real-time impact on an organization’s compliance responsibilities.

4. How has this changed the way you offer tax advice?

Indirect tax obligations at the state and local levels are approached from a consultative mindset of understanding the tax impact of operations and leveraging technology to seek to become compliant in an efficient and accurate manner. The role of the tax department is rapidly evolving, with a significant focus on reducing costs and a push towards automation. This changes the demand for talent and new skill sets, including technology. It is becoming increasingly common to provide indirect tax advice in the context of broader financial transformation conversations.

5. What potential other legislative/regulatory changes are on the horizon that you think will have a big impact on your region/jurisdiction?

The evolving nexus standards, including marketplace facilitator standards, as well as additional guidance regarding the classification and taxability of tangible personal property and services on a state-by-state basis, will likely continue to create a big impact. Over the past few years, several jurisdictions have implemented economic nexus provisions mandating businesses without a physical presence to collect and remit sales tax on transactions in a state if a specified transaction number or dollar amount of sales in a state are reached. More recently, all states that impose a sales tax have adopted marketplace facilitator laws that shift the burden of tax collection to the marketplace facilitator. As new business models evolve, these economic nexuses and marketplace facilitator standards will likely continue to have an impact.

6. What are the potential outcomes that might occur if those changes are implemented?

Potential outcomes include additional compliance obligations for taxpayers and opportunities to leverage technology to understand nexus, sourcing, classification, and the taxability of large volumes of transactions nationwide. This is especially true as it relates to local impositions, where many local jurisdictions are beginning to implement their own economic nexus and marketplace facilitator guidance. In addition, various states have adopted exclusions or special “carve-outs” from the definition of a “marketplace facilitator” for certain types of businesses, making the process more complex to manage.

 

1103.png

This document has been prepared solely for the purpose of publishing in the 2023

ITR World Tax Guide and may not be used for any other purpose. This document and

its contents may not be reproduced, redistributed or passed on, directly or indirectly,

to any other person in whole or in part without Deloitte’s prior written consent.

Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited

(“DTTL”), its global network of member firms, and their related

entities (collectively, the “Deloitte organization”). DTTL (also referred

to as “Deloitte Global”) and each of its member firms and related

entities are legally separate and independent entities, which cannot

obligate or bind each other in respect of third parties. DTTL and each

DTTL member firm and related entity is liable only for its own acts

and omissions, and not those of each other. DTTL does not provide

services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more.

This communication contains general information only, and none of

DTTL, its global network of member firms or their related entities (collectively,

the “Deloitte organization”) is, by means of this communication, rendering

professional advice or services. Before making any decision or taking

any action that may affect your finances or your business, you should

consult a qualified professional adviser.

No representations, warranties or undertakings (express or implied)

are given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information in

this communication, and none of DTTL, its member firms, related

entities, employees or agents shall be liable or responsible for any

loss or damage whatsoever arising directly or indirectly in connection

with any person relying on this communication. DTTL and each of its

member firms, and their related entities, are legally separate and

independent entities.

© 2022. For information, contact Deloitte Global.

 

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Boaz Goren’s move to the upstart PE-backed firm takes the number of senior UK tax professionals who have left EY this year to 13
The allegations against Deloitte Cyprus raise uncomfortable questions about how far the big four can distance themselves from misconduct at member firms
The UAE accounted for most Middle East promotions and new rankings, as A&M Tax, Baker McKenzie, Dhruva Consultants and DLA Piper breached the top tier
Spanish-headquartered multinationals lead on reporting quality, while US and Swiss groups lag in the Fair Tax Foundation’s expanded analysis
Former IRS commissioner Danny Werfel joins ITR for a must-listen conversation spanning his time leading the agency, his AI risk framework, and the future of the OECD
Tax and legal services was PwC’s fastest-growing business line last year, helping to put the firm back on a par with its big four rivals
Ex-EY and Hourani & Partners leader Zain Satardien is using flexible staffing and AI-enabled systems to test a leaner model for specialist legal and tax advice
The big four firm is rightfully prioritising transparency and accountability as it seeks to rebuild from its scandal, but a glaring structural issue remains
A recent hiring flurry has taken the firm’s number of partner appointments this year to 121 and put it on track to hit 160 partner target early
The move brings specialist tax and litigation capability to EY as it seeks to close the gap on Baker McKenzie and Venezuela’s leading local firms
Gift this article