Poland’s new workforce compliance framework: a practical guide for foreign employers

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Poland’s new workforce compliance framework: a practical guide for foreign employers

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-mddp.png
Demonstration in Warsaw, with people marching with national Polish flags
salarko - stock.adobe.com

Anna Misiak, Rafał Sidorowicz, and Agnieszka Telakowska-Harasiewicz of MDDP explain how Poland’s new labour inspection framework affects foreign employers and why flexible workforce models remain available when supported by appropriate governance and compliance measures

Poland has long offered businesses a variety of workforce engagement models, including employment contracts, B2B arrangements, and civil law agreements. Recent changes strengthening the powers of the National Labour Inspectorate (PIP) have attracted considerable attention among employers, particularly those operating internationally. However, the new framework should not be seen as a restriction on business activity. Rather, it reflects a broader European trend towards greater transparency, legal certainty, and alignment between contractual structures and the actual nature of working relationships.

For foreign investors, the key message is reassuring: flexible engagement models remain available under Polish law. The new regulations primarily raise the importance of proper design, documentation, and governance of workforce structures.

Flexible models remain part of the Polish labour market

Contrary to some initial concerns, the new rules do not abolish B2B cooperation or civil law contracts. These arrangements continue to play an important role in the Polish economy and remain an attractive option for employers and individuals interested in working under more flexible arrangements other than an employment contract.

What has changed is the level of scrutiny applied to workforce arrangements. Labour inspectors now have stronger tools to assess whether a particular contractual structure accurately reflects the way work is performed in practice. As a result, businesses should focus not only on contractual wording but also on ensuring that day-to-day cooperation is consistent with the selected model.

This development is not unique to Poland. Similar discussions around worker classification and employment status have emerged across Europe and other major economies as regulators seek to balance labour market flexibility with worker protection.

Greater emphasis on preventive compliance

One of the most notable features of the new framework is the introduction of individual rulings issued by PIP. Inspired by mechanisms already familiar to businesses in tax and social security matters, these rulings allow companies to seek an official assessment of a planned cooperation model before implementing it.

As is always the case, requesting an interpretation of the regulations from the relevant authority has its pros and cons and requires careful consideration before making use of this new option.

A more collaborative inspection process

The regulations also introduce a two-stage approach to addressing potential irregularities. Instead of immediately issuing a decision, labour inspectors are expected to first identify concerns and require employers to take corrective action. Companies may be asked to amend contractual provisions, adjust working practices, or reconsider specific elements of their cooperation model.

For employers, this creates an opportunity to address issues before they escalate into formal proceedings. The approach supports dialogue between businesses and regulators and encourages proactive compliance rather than purely punitive enforcement.

From a company perspective, such a mechanism contributes to greater predictability and allows organisations to react to identified risks in a structured manner.

Workforce planning is becoming a multidisciplinary exercise

The new framework also highlights the growing importance of cooperation between HR, legal, tax, and payroll functions. Enhanced information sharing between labour inspectors, social security institutions, and tax authorities means that workforce planning should increasingly be viewed through a broader compliance lens.

For multinational groups, this trend presents an opportunity to integrate workforce governance into wider risk management processes. Companies that involve cross-functional teams when designing employment and contractor models are likely to be better positioned to navigate the evolving regulatory landscape while maintaining operational flexibility.

This approach is particularly relevant for global businesses operating across multiple jurisdictions, where consistency and transparency have become key elements of effective workforce management.

Building sustainable workforce models

For foreign employers, the most effective response to the new regulations is not to retreat from flexible arrangements but to ensure they are built on solid foundations.

This includes:

  • Reviewing existing B2B and civil law contracts;

  • Assessing whether contractors operate with genuine independence;

  • Verifying that managerial practices support the intended legal structure; and

  • Maintaining documentation that clearly explains the commercial rationale for non-employment arrangements.

Equally important is ensuring that managers understand the practical implications of different workforce models and apply them consistently across the organisation.

Businesses that invest in these governance measures can continue to benefit from the flexibility offered by the Polish labour market while strengthening compliance and reducing the likelihood of future disputes.

Looking ahead

Poland remains one of Central Europe’s most attractive destinations for international investment, supported by a highly qualified workforce, a dynamic business environment, and a variety of legally recognised engagement models.

The new labour inspection framework should therefore be viewed as a compliance development rather than a barrier to market entry. By encouraging greater consistency between contractual arrangements and operational reality, the regulations promote more transparent and sustainable workforce strategies.

For foreign employers, the reforms offer an opportunity to strengthen governance, enhance legal certainty, and build workforce models that combine flexibility with long-term compliance. Organisations that take a proactive approach should remain well positioned to attract talent, support growth, and continue investing successfully in the Polish market.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As tax authorities embrace AI and governments weigh pillar two reforms, Latin America is developing a more connected and internationally focused tax agenda
Advisers with pre-existing corporation tax or self-assessment accounts must now register or risk enforcement action from HMRC
India's tax authorities are increasingly scrutinising the rationale behind cross-border structures
Sharmila Sanmugam's move from industry to WTS UK offers an early glimpse into how the fledgling firm hopes to compete with larger rivals
Historical claims involving KPMG Australia's tax practice have surfaced as the firm battles a separate parliamentary inquiry into its handling of whistleblowers
While AI is revolutionising tax work, it is also reshaping clients’ willingness to pay for advice and their perception of the value generated by tax advisers
From Dhruva Advisors to Svalner Atlas, Ryan is growing fast. Tom Shave discusses consolidation, competition, and tax’s private equity debate
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal the shortlisted nominees for the Middle East Tax Awards
The UK has confirmed its approach to the OECD’s side-by-side deal, but US-parented groups may find pillar two compliance remains far from straightforward
Fragmented pillar two taxation and increased use of AI by tax authorities have left clients fearful of heightened disputes exposure
Gift this article