UK Finance Bill dismays corporate taxpayers

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK Finance Bill dismays corporate taxpayers

Tax specialists and corporate taxpayers have reacted with dismay to the unclear measures to introduce intra-UK transfer pricing regulations and a crackdown on tax avoidance schemes in the UK Finance Bill

Tax specialists and corporate taxpayers have reacted with dismay to the unclear measures to introduce intra-UK transfer pricing regulations and a crackdown on tax avoidance schemes in the UK Finance Bill. The UK Treasury released the 584-page Finance Bill for its first reading on April 8 2004.

By introducing transfer pricing rules to both domestic and cross-border transactions, the UK hopes to avoid any potential challenge from the European Court of Justice that its tax system discriminates against non-UK companies. The transfer pricing rules take effect from April 1 2004, but companies have yet to receive clear guidelines on how they will apply.

Companies and their advisers are in a similar position regarding plans to crackdown on tax avoidance schemes. Tax advisers at law and accounting firms will have to register with the Treasury if they offer any tax avoidance schemes to their clients. There are even suggestions that this will apply to corporate tax managers as well.

Steve Walsh, group tax manager at National Express in London, said the new transfer pricing rules would be the biggest issue for him. "We have about 200 companies in our group and having to review all of them without any change to the tax liability takes a lot of time and money," said Walsh. "There's a bit of a resigned air about the place over this."

Walsh thought the government's strategy to comply with EU law would work but was not happy. "I understand why it (the new transfer pricing regime) has been done, but it doesn't make it less of a hassle for us," he said.

Tony Beare, head of tax at Slaughter and May in London, was equally downbeat about the Finance Bill. "I just despair with the way things are going at the moment," said Beare. "Taxpayers are faced with huge compliance burdens with the domestic transfer pricing rules and the increased disclosure requirements. There is a general feeling that certain things have not been thought through."

The Bill is subject to parliamentary debate and amendments before receiving royal assent, which is expected at the end of July. The Bill receives a second reading on April 20 2004.

ITR Week welcomes your feedback on this or any other story. Please email the author with your comments. Letters may be published online.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The deal, reportedly worth $400m, will add Svalner Atlas’s 50-partner Nordic and Benelux presence to Ryan’s rapidly growing global footprint
The combined firm, which comprises over 1,400 lawyers, will boast robust tax practices in both the UK and US
Cascading tax reform, bullish foreign investment and vigorous TP audits have made Italy’s tax advisory market dynamic and stiffly competitive
As ITR data reveals that 2025 saw more than double the amount of private client hires than 2024, it seems firms are jostling for position
The US multinational paid 20% more tax in 2025 than 2024, it said; in other news, more than 25,000 HMRC staff have been upskilled on AI
Belt and Road Initiative countries face tax incentive conundrums due to pillar two, but relatively few countries would seek to scrap the project, ITR has heard
Hany Elnaggar examines how the OECD’s global minimum tax is reshaping the GCC’s investment incentive landscape, shifting the region from rate-based competition toward substance-driven economic positioning
The acquisition of a two-partner practice from Stephenson Harwood means that Charles Russell Speechlys has the largest private client team in Asia, the firm claimed
Complex and constantly shifting rules on global mobility mean ‘the risk is too great’ for staff to work abroad on personal time, EY’s Maureen Flood tells ITR
While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Gift this article