Germany: Adjustment of VAT clauses in contracts for the purchase of immovable property

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Germany: Adjustment of VAT clauses in contracts for the purchase of immovable property

taxessmall.jpg

In its circular of October 23 2013, the Federal Ministry of Finance made statements regarding the effectiveness of VAT clauses in contracts for the purchase of immovable property, reports Oliver Zugmaier of küffner maunz langer zugmaier.

According to this circular, only unconditional clauses retroact to the time the contract was concluded.

In principle, the supply of immovable property is VAT exempt (Article 135 paragraph 1 lit. j and k of the Directive 2006/112/EC and section 4 no. 9 lit. a of the German VAT Act). The supplier can waive the VAT exemption and opt for taxation (Article 137 paragraph. 1 lit b and c of the Directive 2006/112/EC and Section 9 paragraph. 1 of the German VAT Act). In the fiscal authorities’ view, waiving VAT exemption regarding contracts for the purchase of immovable property can only be declared effective up to the expiry of the period for lodging an appeal.

The fiscal authorities’ view regularly leads to problems in cases where the parties to the contract for the purchase of immovable property assume a transfer of business as a going concern (Article 19 of the Directive 2006/112/EC and Section 1 paragraph 1a of the German VAT Act) that is not subject to VAT, as it often is not clear whether the conditions for the transfer of a business as a going concern are actually met.

There are often serious consequences for the seller if the parties wrongly assume the transfer of a business, as the fiscal authorities will treat the sale as a taxable but VAT exempt supply. Therefore, the transferor regularly needs to adjust his input VAT deduction. Often, an option for taxation is no longer possible. In order to prevent this and “to be on the safe side”, the parties have, in such cases to date, declared the option for VAT.

In its circular of October 23 2013, the Federal Ministry of Finance decreed that such options, that were originally declared as a precautionary measure, are to be made unconditional. Conditional options are invalid.

Because of the Federal Ministry of Finance’s circular, the previously used VAT clauses are to be adapted. In the future, only unconditional VAT clauses should be used in contracts for the purchase of immovable property.

Oliver Zugmaier

Tel: +49 (0)89 / 217 50 12 - 60

Email: oliver.zugmaier@kmlz.de

Website: www.kmlz.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Historical claims involving KPMG Australia's tax practice have surfaced as the firm battles a separate parliamentary inquiry into its handling of whistleblowers
While AI is revolutionising tax work, it is also reshaping clients’ willingness to pay for advice and their perception of the value generated by tax advisers
From Dhruva Advisors to Svalner Atlas, Ryan is growing fast. Tom Shave discusses consolidation, competition, and tax’s private equity debate
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal the shortlisted nominees for the Middle East Tax Awards
The UK has confirmed its approach to the OECD’s side-by-side deal, but US-parented groups may find pillar two compliance remains far from straightforward
Fragmented pillar two taxation and increased use of AI by tax authorities have left clients fearful of heightened disputes exposure
Grant Thornton Advisors’ latest acquisition has produced the fifth-largest US advisory firm by revenue, but there’s still a clear gulf between it and the big four
Crowe joins Grant Thornton, WTS and Ryan in attracting PE investment, suggesting that dealmakers remain bullish on the tax advisory sector
HMRC expects advisers to meet ever-higher compliance criteria. After 24 consecutive qualified audit opinions, many will ask whether HMRC should hold itself to the same standards
The purchase of Marosa represents the second major tax tech consolidation this week, raising questions of a broader industry trend
Gift this article