New rules on advance tax rulings

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


New rules on advance tax rulings

sobonska.jpg

Malgorzata Sobonska

The amendments to the Polish tax code (Tax Ordinance) which came into force from July 1 2007 caused quite important changes in the process of obtaining advance tax rulings. Until June 30 2007 rulings were issued by the local tax offices and if the taxpayer was not satisfied with the rulings, they were able to appeal the rulings to the tax chamber.

As from July 1 2007 the advance rulings are issued by the minister of finance.

According to these new regulations, the tax ruling issued by the minister may be applied both to past and future transaction, which is quite an important development as until June 30, due to unclear law, tax offices used to reject to issue the advance rulings which relates to the planned future transactions. It must be emphasised that the scope of protection granted by obtaining a ruling differs, depends on whether it applies to a past, present or future transaction.

In case the ruling refers to a planned, future transaction (in other words the tax implications of the transaction will take place after the ruling is delivered) and the taxpayer benefits from full protection, that is, in a case where the ruling was found as wrong (for example as a result of the final tax office decision or tax court verdict) then the taxpayer will not be obliged to pay tax arrears or penal interest. Also no fiscal penal proceedings might be commenced against individuals responsible for tax matters at the taxpayers' enterprise.

The difference with advance tax rulings concerning transactions already preformed is that in the latter case the taxpayer shall be obliged to pay outstanding taxes (however without penal interest).

Should the ruling be changed, the protection continues in the accounting period (month, quarter, year) in which the information about the change was delivered and the following one. The unfavorable ruling might be challenged against by appealing to the regional tax (administrative) court.

Another important development is the possibility to apply for the advance ruling also for potential investors, (without a legal presence in Poland or still not registered taxpayers) including also foreign entities. In such a case the protection will apply to the companies that will be created by the investors (that do not yet exist but will when the ruling is issued), branches or rep offices, depends on who will conduct the operations described in the application for the ruling. Finally it needs to be mentioned that the rulings are now payable, the application for tax binding ruling is subject to 75 PLN ($27.23) fee. This amount is to be multiplied by the number of questions asked.

Malgorzata Sobonska (malgorzata.sobonska@mddp.pl), Warsaw

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It was also a memorable night for Galicia, KPMG, Skadden and Pinheiro Neto, all of which scooped major awards at a gala ceremony in New York
The former Deloitte UK CEO earned a 45% raise in a year when 1,000 staff reportedly lost their jobs – and the pay gap is only getting bigger
In a seminal development for big law, the 95-year-old firm is set to cease operations after a series of high-profile partner departures
UK Chancellor John Healey extended a VAT cut, suspended tariffs, increased a bank surcharge and vowed to increase funding for HMRC
Kristine Riisberg warned that TP decisions can determine top-up tax exposure under pillar two, while global consensus over the rules remains unsettled
Both Germany’s NIS2 and the EU AI Act now determine whether a tax function can meet its obligations – and both can make management personally accountable
Originators, loan purchasers and securitisation vehicles may need to revisit servicing agreements and pricing after a key judgment narrowed the VAT credit management exemption
Opening doors for existing talent within Baker McKenzie and a desire for enhanced legal capabilities informed Ricardo Perera’s switch from KPMG
Boaz Goren’s move to the upstart PE-backed firm takes the number of senior UK tax professionals who have left EY this year to 13
The allegations against Deloitte Cyprus raise uncomfortable questions about how far the big four can distance themselves from misconduct at member firms
Gift this article