Poland: Poland overhauls structure of fiscal administration

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: Poland overhauls structure of fiscal administration

sarna.jpg

Alicja Sarna

Fiscal administration in Poland will face major changes in its structure and organisation from March 1 when the new law on National Fiscal Administration enters into force.

The main objective of the new regulations is, as its justifications says, to reduce tax fraud, improve collectability of taxes and customs duties, reduce the costs of treasury administration with respect to the amount of government revenue obtained and adjust tax administration to the conditions of cooperation with the tax administration of EU member states.

Governmental tax and customs administration operate separately, and tax competencies are divided between the tax administration and fiscal control unit. From March 1 all these sections will become combined. The law will also limit the role of the finance minister with respect to taxes. His responsibilities will be taken over mostly by the chief of the new administration, i.e. the head of the National Fiscal Administration, who will perform the functions that are now carried out by the Head of the Customs Service, General Inspector of Treasury Control and General Inspector of Financial Information. Additionally, the Minister of Finance will issue general tax rulings (i.e. rulings not addressed to an individual taxpayer).

The newly established Director of the National Fiscal Information will take over responsibilities regarding, i.e. issuance of the individual tax rulings and processing reliable tax and customs information.

The head of the tax and customs office will perform a role similar to the directors of fiscal control offices and heads of customs offices, who are responsible for tax and customs control, as well as establishing and determining levies and placing goods under customs procedures.

The head of the tax office, just as before, will have the primary role in the collection of levies and enforcement of debts while the director of the fiscal administration chamber will supervise both authorities at the first instance.

The new law also provides for standardisation of tax proceedings, including:

  • Tax and customs control, which will replace fiscal control proceedings and will verify whether regulations are complied through an analysis of declared tax bases and the correctness of tax settlements – the decision issued as a result of such controls can be challenged by appealing to the same authority;

  • Audit and audit activities (so far carried out by treasury control institutions);

  • Official verifications (so far carried out by the customs services); and

  • Regulations concerning tax controls performed by the head of the tax office and tax proceedings will remain unchanged.

In certain situations, the National Fiscal Administration will be also responsible for investigating, preventing, detecting and prosecuting given crimes i.e. document fraud, intellectual fraud, using documents with false information and intellectual fraud; deceit; organised crime and participation in an organised criminal group.

Alicja Sarna (alicja.sarna@mddp.pl)

MDDP, Poland

Tel: +48 (22) 322 68 88

Website: www.mddp.pl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

New research, which suggests LLMs can silently corrupt complex documents, should alert tax and legal teams relying on AI to handle iterative drafting and compliance workflows
Maintaining increased funding for HMRC is a ‘high possibility’ if he becomes PM, ITR has also heard
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2026 Europe Tax Awards
The firm has hired a team of private client lawyers from Withers to launch in New York and Connecticut, though ITR analysis suggests it faces stiff competition
The ability of tax authorities to receive and analyse data is becoming ‘quite advanced’, warns Stuart Lang, head of EY’s compliance co-sourcing solution
The Court of Appeal ruling clarifies that treaty benefits are not abusive where transactions are commercially driven, providing greater certainty on “main purpose” anti-avoidance tests
Despite the Netherlands featuring an unusual concentration of World Tax-ranked technology-led providers, sources believe there’s a long way to go to challenge the established players
Ethics seems to be playing a subservient role to an entitlement culture borne out of a pervasive ‘revenue at all costs’ mentality at the big four
Historical World Tax data suggests the ‘largest law firm merger in history’ may not pose a serious threat to the world's leading tax practices
The repeal of Libya’s statute of limitations and tougher enforcement leave taxpayers navigating a high-stakes choice between conciliation and litigation
Gift this article