Russia: Russia amends tax laws to involve taxpayers in audits with higher tax authorities

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Russia: Russia amends tax laws to involve taxpayers in audits with higher tax authorities

grinko.jpg

Alexander Grinko

In order to improve the examination of tax audit materials and tax control procedures, amendments to the Tax Code of the Russian Federation have been adopted.

The amendments in Federal Law No. 130-FZ, dated May 1 2016, "On Amendments to Part One of the Tax Code" (the Amended Tax Law), will provide greater transparency and fairness when the tax authorities are issuing decisions based on the results of tax control measures.

Involving the taxpayer

The Amended Tax Law provides additional grounds for a taxpayer to exert their right to be involved in the examination of tax audit materials by a higher tax authority. These rights can be used:

  • If there are contradictions in the information contained in the junior tax authority's material; or

  • If there is inconsistency between the information submitted by the taxpayer and the information contained in the materials of the junior tax authority.

Before adopting the Amended Tax Law, there was only one basis on which a taxpayer could be given the right to be involved in examining tax audit materials with a higher tax authority. This was if the junior tax authority had violated significant procedural conditions during the examination of tax audit materials.

Key changes

In recent years, the higher tax authorities have significantly improved the way they treat appeals against the conclusions of examinations and the resulting decisions conducted by junior tax authorities, and have reversed a significant number of the decisions of the junior tax authorities (e.g. 33.8% of appeals in Russia in 2015 were overturned in favour of the taxpayers). These amendments add substantial additional value to taxpayers.

The legislative amendments will most likely lead to improved examinations and more objective final decisions by the tax authorities at the pre-trial stage.

The amendments also provide taxpayers with the opportunity to be involved in reviewing the reason for an appeal, as well as all audit materials and additionally submitted documents with lawyers and other professionals working at the higher tax authority, delivering a higher level of examination.

It also gives the taxpayer the opportunity to provide sound oral reasoning, and to discuss issues/questions with members of the group examining the case, including the chief/deputy chief of the higher tax authority (the person who will issue the appeal decision).

As such, pre-trial tax dispute examinations will become more complex and longer.

As a result of these amendments, Russian taxpayers, after two direct oral interrogations, will receive more complex analysis of the issues pertinent to their case, and so be able to give and gain additional information to decide whether they should begin litigation proceedings against the tax authority.

The amendments affect appeals submitted after June 2 2016.

Alexander Grinko (agrinko@kpmg.ru)

KPMG in Russia and the CIS

Tel: +7 (495) 937 44 77

Website: www.kpmg.ru

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
Gift this article