Cyprus: Protocol on the double tax treaty signed between Cyprus and South Africa

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cyprus: Protocol on the double tax treaty signed between Cyprus and South Africa

charalambous.jpg

Katerina Charalambous

A protocol amending the Agreement for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital between South Africa and Cyprus was signed on April 1 2015. According to the protocol, article 10 (Dividends) of the double tax treaty will be replaced. As such, dividends paid by a company resident in one contracting state to a company resident in the other contracting state will be taxed in the latter. Nonetheless, withholding tax (WHT) will be incurred in the first mentioned state at a rate of 5% in cases where the beneficial owner of the dividend holds at least 10% of the capital in the dividend paying company. In a different case, a 10% WHT will be incurred on the gross amount of the dividends. It is also noted that the two contracting states will by mutual agreement decide on the application of these limitations.

Article 26 (Exchange of Information) of the Treaty will also be replaced to include further clarifications in relation to the exchange of information process between the two states. More specifically, the wording in paragraph 1 of article 26, is altered to clarify that the states will exchange as much information as is foreseeably relevant for carrying out the provisions of the agreement, replacing the phrase "as much information as is necessary". The change is in line with the OECD Model Treaty and the Commentary, according to which states must exchange information to the widest possible extent but are not at liberty to engage in 'fishing expeditions'. Additional paragraphs are also included to clarify that the state which receives an information exchange request will use its internal processes to retrieve said information even if this is not necessary for its own domestic purposes.

The protocol will enter into force as soon as the contracting states notify each other on the completion of the procedures required by their domestic legislation. Once the protocol enters into force it will constitute an integral part of the agreement between the two states.

Katerina Charalambous (katerina.a.charalambous@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast, Cyprus Office

Tel: +357 22 699 222

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and US President Donald Trump have agreed that the countries will look to conclude a deal by July 21, 2025
The firm’s lack of transparency regarding its tax leaks scandal should see the ban extended beyond June 30, senators Deborah O’Neill and Barbara Pocock tell ITR
Despite posing significant administrative hurdles, digital services taxes remain ‘the best way forward’ for emerging economies, says Neil Kelley, COO of Ascoria
A ‘joint understanding’ among G7 countries that ‘defends American interests’ is set to be announced, Scott Bessent claimed
The ‘big four’ firm’s inaugural annual report unveiled a sharp drop in profits for 2024; in other news, Baker McKenzie and Perkins Coie expanded their US tax benches
Representatives from the two countries focused on TP as they met this week to evaluate progress under a previously signed agreement – it is understood
The UK accountancy firm’s transfer pricing lead tells ITR about his expat lifestyle, taking risks, and what makes tax cool
Dolphin Drilling intends to discuss the final liability amount and manner of settlement with HM Revenue and Customs
Winning the case against the 20% VAT imposition was always going to be an uphill challenge for the claimants, UK tax advisers argue
A ‘paradigm shift’ in Chile’s tax enforcement requires compliance architecture built on proactive governance, strategic documentation and active monitoring of judicial developments
Gift this article