Malta: Inland Revenue department issues FATCA guidelines

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Malta: Inland Revenue department issues FATCA guidelines

vella.jpg

salomone.jpg

Donald Vella


Mark Galea Salomone

On December 16 2013 Malta and the US signed an agreement to improve international tax compliance and to implement the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) provisions. The FATCA agreement was incorporated into Maltese law by virtue of Legal Notice 78 of 2014. The Maltese Inland Revenue Department recently issued guidelines for the implementation of the FATCA agreement and the FATCA regulations in Malta providing insight into what is expected of Malta financial institutions to comply with FATCA. The FATCA regulations provide that the FATCA agreement and the FATCA regulations are to be interpreted in accordance with the FATCA guidelines, unless it is clear that the context requires otherwise.

Registration

Malta financial institutions need to register with the Maltese Commissioner for Revenue for FATCA purposes even if they are non-reporting financial institutions. Each Malta financial institution is also required to register with the US IRS and obtain a Global Intermediary Identification Number (GIIN). The FATCA guidelines exclude non-reporting Malta financial institutions, deemed-compliant Malta financial institutions and active and passive non-financial foreign entities from registering with the IRS. In the case of a financial institution with a local client base that has a reporting obligation due to it holding US reportable accounts, a GIIN will be required.

Compliance and reporting

Once the requisite procedure and due diligence, as detailed in the FATCA regulations and FATCA guidelines, is carried out and a Malta financial institution has identified reportable accounts, it must report certain information to the Commissioner of Revenue (for instance: name, address, US tax information number and account balance). It is important to note that where a reporting financial institution has no information to report, a nil return is still required.

The FATCA guidelines state that significant non-compliance may be determined from either an IRS or the Commissioner for Revenue's perspective. Examples provided include: (i) repeated failure to file a return or repeated late filing; (ii) ongoing or repeated failure to register, supply accurate information or establish appropriate due diligence processes; (iii) intentional provision of substantially incorrect information; or (iv) deliberate or negligent omission of required information.

The FATCA guidelines do not provide a concrete definition of "transactions and schemes" carried out by persons to avoid the obligations placed upon them by the FATCA regulations. It is however intended that the phrase will be interpreted widely and the effect of the anti-avoidance regulation is that the FATCA regulations will apply as if the transactions and schemes had not been entered into.

Should a Malta financial institution fail to comply and report, the mechanics of FATCA will come into play and a 30% withholding tax imposed on the US source income will apply. The FATCA guideline has provided much needed context to the FATCA regulations as the Inland Revenue Department continues to encourage Malta financial institutions to comply with FATCA.

Donald Vella (donald.vella@camilleripreziosi.com) and Mark Galea Salomone (mark.galeasalomone@camilleripreziosi.com)

Camilleri Preziosi

Tel: +356 212 38989

Website: www.camilleripreziosi.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While the IBS incorporates taxable events previously covered by state and municipal taxes, its governance and operational logic represent a significant departure from the legacy model
The new office on the fourth floor of 4 More London will span 14,230 square feet, with the potential to expand to the first and second floors
MNEs now face a shift from modelling to execution as the side‑by‑side deal forces tax teams to upgrade systems, harmonise data, and prevent costly pillar two mismatches
As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Gift this article