Bulgaria: New appendix to the corporate annual tax return

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Bulgaria: New appendix to the corporate annual tax return

pechilkova.jpg

Donka Pechilkova

The Bulgarian Ministry of Finance added an important new Appendix (Reference No.1 to Appendix 4) to the annual tax return that legal entities are obliged to submit for the calendar year of 2013. The appendix concerns transactions between related parties (both local and foreign ones) and transactions that were carried out with companies registered in offshore zones. In the application, all companies are obliged to disclose the amounts of such transactions that were settled during the year, as well as the type of the transactions (sales or purchases of goods, services and so on; loans; intercompany remunerations and other types of incomes or expenses). Due to the fact that the above-mentioned changes also concern transactions with physical persons, on March 10 2014 the National Revenue Agency published instructions for the filling out of Reference No.1 to Appendix 4 of the annual tax return declaration according to the text and meaning of Article 92 of the Corporate Income Tax Act and Reference No.7 to Appendix 4 of the annual tax return, related to Article 50 of the Income Taxes on Natural Persons Act. The aforementioned guidelines also attempt to clarify the ambiguity of the phrase "persons that have carried out transactions" included in Reference No. 1, which in some cases is replaced with "settled transactions", creating an obvious inconsistency in the method of reporting of loans and other transactions.

The guidelines also indicate the exceptions when it is not necessary to provide information for Reference No. 1, such as dividends and liquidation proceeds, personal performing of work by partners or owners in non-labour relationships in the company, with duly provided tax and insurance information. One must not forget that in cases of failure to file an appendix to the annual tax return or if false or incorrect data is provided, the penalty to be imposed ranges between 100 to 1,000 lev ($70 to $700) (Article 262 of the Corporate Income Tax Act). In this regard, it is stated that considering the fact that Appendix No 4 is a new requirement and not well-known to taxpayers, one should be cautious about the presence of any errors.

This new requirement is another step made by the tax administration towards the building of a harmonised tax system in the country, and one which will also cover the requirements of the EU legislation and meet the needs for a unified international tax control.

Donka Pechilkova (donka.pechilkova@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global, Sofia Office

Tel: +359 2 988 69 78

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Awards
Submit your nominations to this year's WIBL EMEA Awards by 6 February 2026
Defending loss situations in TP is not about denying the existence of losses but about showing, through proactive measures, that the losses reflect genuine commercial realities
Further empowerment of HMRC enforcement has been praised, but the pre-Budget OBR leak was described as ‘shambolic’
Michel Braun of WTS Digital reviews ITR’s inaugural AI in tax event, and concludes that AI will enhance, not replace, the tax professional
The report is solid and balanced as it correctly underscores the ambitious institutional redesign that Brazil has undertaken in adopting a dual VAT model, experts tell ITR
The Brazilian law firm partner warns against going independent too early, considers the weight of political pressure, and tells ITR what makes tax cool
The lessons from Ireland are clear: selective, targeted, and credible fiscal incentives can unlock supply and investment
The ITR in-house award winner delves into his dramatic novelisation of tax transformation, and declares that 'tax doesn’t need AI right now'
Recent news of job cuts at EY is symptomatic of how the PwC controversy has tarnished the reputation of the entire ‘big four’
Experts reportedly discussed extending the safe harbour to 2027 to give countries more time to legislate; in other news, Baker McKenzie and Greenberg Traurig made senior tax hires
Gift this article