Greece: Administrative guidelines published on tax benefits of cross-border restructurings

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Greece: Administrative guidelines published on tax benefits of cross-border restructurings

intl-updates-small.jpg
tsourapa.jpg

Diana Tsourapa

The Greek Independent Authority for Public Revenue (IAPR) has published Circular POL. 1057/2017 (the Circular), which sheds some light and provides the much anticipated administrative guidelines on the implementation of the Greek Income Tax Code (GITC) tax beneficial provisions, applicable to mergers, divisions, partial divisions, spin-offs and share-for-share exchanges (collectively the restructuring provisions). The provisions apply both in cases of Greek and EU cross-border restructurings.

The provisions have been in force since January 1 2014, and have been applied to restructurings realised on the basis of corporate resolutions taken as of that date onwards. In this context, the lack of clear guidelines so far has created a misty tax regime that the issued Circular aims to clarify.

As a preliminary remark, the IAPR explicitly stipulates that the tax provisions under consideration do not affect the relevant corporate framework as defined by the applicable corporate legislation. Therefore, the restructuring provisions should be considered as regulating tax issues, without setting deviations nor additional requirements as regards the relevant corporate procedures, with the exception of the partial division that is an option provided only by the provisions of the GITC.

Furthermore, the IAPR has highlighted that application of the GITC restructuring provisions is optional for the taxpayer, since a business may opt to be subject to the general tax regime. In any case, the exercise of this option should be evidenced by any appropriate means, such as the respective corporate resolutions.

In addition, as regards the interpretation of the specific rules set by the provisions at hand, i.e. transfer of assets in exchange for securities – e.g. spin-offs and carve-outs – (Article 52 of the GITC), exchange of shares (Article 53 of the GITC) as well as mergers, divisions and partial divisions (Article 54 of the GITC), the Circular provided important clarifications on the requirements for their application as well as the tax benefits stemming therefrom.

In view of the above, the Circular has to a great extent contributed to the interpretation of the GITC restructuring provisions by setting the basic directions that had been missing for more than three years since the enactment of the latest GITC.

However, one should take into consideration the relevant targeted anti-avoidance provision (Article 56 of the GITC) as per which the tax benefits could be overturned in cases where the restructuring is effected for the main purpose (or where one of the main purposes is) to avoid or evade tax. The aforementioned anti-avoidance rule, combined with the fact that the Greek tax authorities have reserved the right to set additional requirements in order to avoid abuse of the restructuring provisions, could lead to the conclusion that there are still certain grey aspects of the Greek tax framework. To this end, the Greek tax administration could further elaborate these issues, especially in lack of administrative and judicial precedents, in order to create a safe, predictable and investor-friendly tax environment.

Diana Tsourapa (diana.tsourapa@gr.ey.com), Maroussi

EY

Tel: +30 210 2886 000

Website: www.ey.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UK’s Labour government has an unpopular prime minister, an unpopular chancellor and not a lot of good options as it prepares to deliver its autumn Budget
Awards
The firms picked up five major awards between them at a gala ceremony held at New York’s prestigious Metropolitan Club
The streaming company’s operating income was $400m below expectations following the dispute; in other news, the OECD has released updates for 25 TP country profiles
Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we focus on EMEA’s top performers in the first of three regional analyses
Firms are spending serious money to expand their tax advisory practices internationally – this proves that the tax practice is no mere sideshow
The controversial deal would ‘preserve the gains achieved under pillar two’, the OECD said; in other news, HMRC outlined its approach to dealing with ‘harmful’ tax advisers
Former EY and Deloitte tax specialists will staff the new operation, which provides the firm with new offices in Tokyo and Osaka
Gift this article