BEPS: The endgame
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

BEPS: The endgame

The boldest initiative in transfer pricing history entered the homestretch in October 2015 with the release of the OECD's final report on its base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) project. The reverberations are being felt across North America, Europe, Asia and beyond.

Multinational enterprises will soon need to provide tax authorities with details of almost every facet of their business through the master file, local file and country-by-country reports: key profit drivers, global value chains, transfer pricing policies for major services and intangibles, MNE financial statements, and more. Is there any doubt about who has the upper hand: taxpayers or tax authorities?

The objective of the OECD's plan is clear: combat aggressive profit-shifting strategies. BEPS was designed to ensure MNEs reveal profits in jurisdictions based on assets, risks and actual functions. It is unsurprising then, that BEPS is shaking up countries and companies.

While tax officials and legislators worldwide are moving quickly, many companies are moving cautiously. Some are concerned about how authorities will handle tax data. Others worry about confidentiality breaches or the risk of audits and double taxation But a sense of urgency is needed, otherwise, MNEs risk penalties, reputational risks and additional taxes.

In his candid assessment of the tension between taxpayers and tax authorities, Tae Hyung Kim, a partner at Deloitte Korea, explains what multinationals must consider and what they should fear.

Hendrik Blankenstein and Caterina Colling Russo of Tax Partner AG – Taxand Switzerland examine whether the newly introduced DEMPE analysis benefits MNEs and tax authorities, or whether it will just confuse matters and result in an increase of intangibles-related transfer pricing disputes.

Dale Hill, a partner at Gowling WLG in Canada, considers the application of BEPS guidelines to the transfer pricing aspects of intangibles and the impact on tax-motivated IP migration strategies. His insightful analysis encompasses both pre- and post-BEPS strategies.

Finally, questions remain about how much change the US is prepared to implement, but the OECD's recommendations are without doubt having an impact. David Forst and Larissa Neumann of Fenwick & West discuss US developments including the IRS and Treasury Department-issued 482 temporary regulations.

Caroline Byrne

Managing editor, TPWeek.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Jeremy Brown arrives at the firm after a near 16-year career with Deloitte
PwC could elect a woman into the senior leadership position for the first time; in other news, KPMG Australia has extended its CEO’s term
The Senate report into PwC’s scandal is titled ‘The cover up worsens the crime’
Law firms that are conscious of their role in society are more likely to win work, according to a survey of over 23,000 in-house professionals
The firm’s tax business generated a quarter of HLB’s overall revenues in 2023
While successful pillar two implementation will require collaboration across all units, a combination of internal and external tax advice is at the centre of the effort
Binance has also been accused of manipulating foreign exchange rates via currency speculation and rate-fixing
Six individuals should have raised questions over information they received but did not breach professional standards, according to the firm
The partnership of KPMG UK has installed Holt for a second term as CEO and senior partner; in other news, a Baker McKenzie partner has sued the IRS
HSBC has settled a claim originally worth £240m relating to a failed film tax relief scheme without admitting liability or wrongdoing
Gift this article