Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher

UN adds one more dimension to transfer pricing guidance

01 September 2011

Sophie Ashley

As the UN’s star in global transfer pricing rises, officials, taxpayers and practitioners are discussing the role it plays in shaping policy and how that affects the OECD. Sophie Ashley explores the multiple dimensions of international transfer pricing guidance.


A parallel universe carries infinite possibilities. Perhaps it is this that makes the idea so irresistible to scientists, determined to prove their existence through the complexities of mathematics.

As the UN's star in global transfer pricing rises, it is tempting to imagine how the multilateral body would do things differently to the OECD, seen as the global arbiter for transfer pricing guidelines.

The UN's growing number of fans believe the OECD puts the interests of the world's most developed economies first. They argue that as a bigger organisation, the UN is in a better place to lead transfer pricing policy.

The OECD's transfer pricing guidelines represent the global standard for related-party transactions. Though the guidance is not without fault, it is generally adhered to by most jurisdictions with transfer pricing rules. But, as more and more countries implement transfer pricing documentation requirements and legislation, the need for simplicity, more in...



This article is locked content, available to current subscribers or trialists.

  • Current subscribers or trialists - Please log in to view this article in full.
  • New users - Please take a free 7 day trial.
  • Expired subscribers or trialists - Please subscribe to gain immediate full access.

If you think you've received this message in error, please contact your account manager, Nick Burroughs:
Email: nburroughs@euromoneyplc.com, Tel: +44 (0)207 779 8379

Subscribe now

Subscribe today to gain full access to International Tax Review.

Subscribe

Free trial

Take a free trial now and gain 7 days of full access to International Tax Review.

Free trial





International Tax Review Profile

RT @TPWeek: BREAKING: EC rules #Apple received up to €13 billion in illegal tax benefits from Ireland. https://t.co/A2bHdXsjCl' target='blank'>https://t.co/A2bHdXsjCl https://t.co

Aug 30 2016 10:15 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

Japan and Panama signed a #TIEA on August 25.

Aug 29 2016 08:34 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

Will the State Aid ruling on Apple cause tension between the US Treasury & Brussels at a precarious time for the EU?

Aug 29 2016 08:31 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

RT @TPWeek: FT report that Apple face multibillion tax bill in EU State Aid ruling. https://t.co/I54GvcWWQf

Aug 29 2016 07:15 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

RT @OECDtax: #Andorra #SaintKittsandNevis & #Senegal also further strengthen intl #tax co-operation today https://t.co/sjFP29nEQM https://t…

Aug 26 2016 08:47 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Correspondents