EU harmonises VAT rules on vouchers
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU harmonises VAT rules on vouchers

EU harmonises VAT rules on vouchers

The European Union Council has adopted the Voucher Directive, which is aimed at clarifying and harmonising the relevant VAT rules.

The directive, which was adopted on June 27 2016, will apply from January 1 2019.

Vouchers represent a market of more than €50 billion ($55 billion) per year in the EU. Rules applying to vouchers have not been harmonised in the European Union (EU), leading to risks of double or non-taxation, and real practical difficulties for concerned businesses.

This lack of harmonisation has led to lengthy and difficult discussions, which explains the gap between the time the European Commission released its first proposal for a directive in 2012 and the final adoption of the directive in June 2016.

Scope of application

Vouchers come in many forms, including pre-paid telecom cards, gift cards, meal vouchers, coupons for the purchase of goods or services, etc. Regardless of what they are called, the common feature of vouchers is that they are instruments that can be used to redeem goods or services.

Price coupon discounts are excluded from the scope of the directive, as are transport tickets, admission tickets to cinemas or museums, postage stamps or similar items.

For VAT purposes, a voucher is an instrument where:

  • There is an obligation to accept the voucher as payment or part of the payment for a supply of goods or services; and

  • The goods or services to be supplied, or the identities of their potential suppliers, are indicated on the voucher or in related documentation, such as the terms and conditions for the use of the voucher.

Vouchers can be in hard copy or electronic format.

Distinction between single-purpose and multi-purpose vouchers

The directive is based on the fundamental distinction between single purpose and multiple-pupose vouchers.

Single-purpose voucher

A single-purpose voucher (SPV) is one where, at the time the voucher is issued, the location of the goods or services related to the voucher are known, as is the VAT due on the goods or services. These requirements imply a limitation on the use of the voucher, such as only being redeemable in only one jurisidiction or by a specified seller or industry. A meal voucher is a typical example of an SPV.

Each transfer of an SPV is treated as the transfer of the goods or the services to which the voucher relates. In theory, the transfer of the SPV is assimilated with the transfer of the goods or services to which it relates, although the taxable person does not perform the service or supply the good. Consequently, VAT will be due on each transfer, unless the SPV relates to a VAT-exempt good or service.

Multi-purpose voucher

A multi-purpose voucher (MPV) is defined negatively (i.e. any voucher other than an SPV). Unlike an SPV, an MPV can be issued for goods or services subject to different VAT rates. For example, Luxembourg has four different VAT rates (3%, 8%, 14% and 17%).

VAT will be due only when and if the MPV is used. It should also be noted that VAT on becomes chargeable on the final transaction when the voucher is used. As such, VAT will not be due when a company issuing the MPVs on its goods or services sells them to a business operating in several different countries, which then sells to another business. Known as preceding transfers, these business-to-business transactions remain outside the scope of VAT. Therefore, VAT is only due on the MPV once it is redeemed by the end user.

The taxable basis of the supply of goods or services provided in respect of an MPV is equal to the price paid for the voucher, or if this information is unknown, the monetary value indicated on the voucher or in the related documentation, less the VAT relating to the goods or services supplied.

Transposition and date of application

EU member states must adopt and publish the legal instruments (laws, regulations and administrative provisions) necessary to implement the Voucher Directive into their national laws by December 31 2018.

The directive will be applicable to vouchers issued from January 1 2019.

There are no transitional rules in the directive (i.e. it is silent on the treatment of vouchers issued before December 31 2018, but redeemed after January 1 2019). It is up to the member states to deal with these cases and implement transitional measures if their domestic rules differ from those in the directive.

This long-awaited directive is an important step forward and the practical impact of the rules should be considered carefully by affected businesses.

Glohr

Raphaël Glohr

Partner, Deloitte Luxembourg

Email: rglohr@deloitte.lu

Tel: +352 45145 2665

Website: www.deloitte.lu

Lambion

Michel Lambion

Director, Deloitte Luxembourg

Email: milambion@deloitte.lu

Tel: +352 45145 3993

Website: www.deloitte.lu



more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Senate report into PwC’s scandal is titled ‘The cover up worsens the crime’
Law firms that are conscious of their role in society are more likely to win work, according to a survey of over 23,000 in-house professionals
The firm’s tax business generated a quarter of HLB’s overall revenues in 2023
While successful pillar two implementation will require collaboration across all units, a combination of internal and external tax advice is at the centre of the effort
Binance has also been accused of manipulating foreign exchange rates via currency speculation and rate-fixing
Six individuals should have raised questions over information they received but did not breach professional standards, according to the firm
The partnership of KPMG UK has installed Holt for a second term as CEO and senior partner; in other news, a Baker McKenzie partner has sued the IRS
HSBC has settled a claim originally worth £240m relating to a failed film tax relief scheme without admitting liability or wrongdoing
Their prediction comes after the IRS announced it would send compliance letters to large foreign companies emphasising their US tax obligations
The ex-client is also suing the entire EY Australia partnership
Gift this article