TP Week International Tax Review
Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher

SARS and National Treasury seek South African DTA amendments

31 May 2012

Joe Dalton


The South African Revenue Service (SARS) and National Treasury are discussing whether to amend tax legislation after SARS lost a recent Supreme Court of Appeal case in which a double tax avoidance agreement (DTA) was deemed to override domestic law.

Due to a mismatch between South Africa’s domestic legislation and the rules of a DTA with Luxembourg, the taxpayer in the dispute, Tradehold Ltd (Tradehold), was able to shift its residency without paying SARS any exit tax.

Background

Tradehold is an investment holding company listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. In July 2002, Tradehold’s directors held a board meeting in Luxembourg. At this meeting, it was decided that all future board meetings would be held in Luxembourg, meaning the company’s effective place of management was transferred there from South Africa.

Under article 4(3) of the South Africa-Luxembourg DTA, the deemed place of residence of a company is the place where its effective management is situated.

However, although Tradehold became a Luxembourg resident in July 2002 under the terms of the DTA, South African domestic legislation at the time provided that Tradehold also remained a South African resident...



This article is available to subscribers and current trialists of International Tax Review only. Please log in or subscribe for access to the rest of the article.

Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 7 days of access.

Subscribe now

This article is available to subscribers only. To read the rest of this article  please subscrbe.

Subscribe

Free trial

This article is available to trialists and subscribers only. Please take a free 7 day trial to read the rest of the article.

Free trial






 

Most read articles

Poll

What is your biggest FATCA concern?







Back to top