Due to a mismatch between South Africa’s domestic legislation and the rules of a DTA with Luxembourg, the taxpayer in the dispute, Tradehold Ltd (Tradehold), was able to shift its residency without paying SARS any exit tax.
Background
Tradehold is an investment holding company listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. In July 2002, Tradehold’s directors held a board meeting in Luxembourg. At this meeting, it was decided that all future board meetings would be held in Luxembourg, meaning the company’s effective place of management was transferred there from South Africa.
Under article 4(3) of the South Africa-Luxembourg DTA, the deemed place of residence of a company is the place where its effective management is situated.
However, although Tradehold became a Luxembourg resident in July 2002 under the terms of the DTA, South African domestic legislation at the time provided that Tradehold also remained a South African resident...
This article is available to subscribers and current trialists of International Tax Review only. Please log in or subscribe for access to the rest of the article.
Alternatively take a free trial, giving you 7 days of access.
Subscribe now
This article is available to subscribers only. To read the rest of this article please subscrbe.
Subscribe
Free trial
This article is available to trialists and subscribers only. Please take a free 7 day trial to read the rest of the article.
Free trial