COMMENT: Why Indian taxpayers need to be patient during a busy 2012

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

COMMENT: Why Indian taxpayers need to be patient during a busy 2012

india-flag.jpg

Rumours of delays in the implementation of India's Direct Taxes Code (DTC) and goods and service tax (GST) should be welcomed by taxpayers.

While there has been no formal announcement confirming that both of these changes will not be effective on April 1 2012, you would be hard pushed to find an Indian tax professional prepared to bet that this target will be met.

So why are these delays good news? Surely, having certainty and being given ample time to prepare for change is vital for business operations?

But what needs to be realised is that the reason for the holdup is that the government is not happy with the laws and are not prepared to let them loose on the public.

The DTC and GST have already been delayed a number of times and so this would suggest that there are still more problems to overcome.

At the end of 2011, International Tax Review organised and attended Indian tax conferences where these two topics dominated discussions. Delegates argued about the challenges of preparing for change. This is a fair argument. How many countries would drastically alter their direct and indirect tax laws at the same time, to take effect on the same day, and expect everything to go smoothly?

Matching these arguments were professionals eager for the government to listen to their concerns and implement them rather than rush in an imperfect law that will lead to increased litigation and higher levels of uncertainty – something that would do little to improve India's image to investors around the world.

The only solution, and this may not be popular with taxpayers, is to sit tight and carry on business as usual. Speculation as to why things have been delayed and the growing anger pointed towards the government will not help speed things along and will damage the image India portrays to the wider world as a place to do business.

The image of India's tax system to the rest of the world is the focus of this month's cover story of India Quarterly. While the future of the DTC and GST is still unknown, India still attracts high levels of foreign investment in all sectors. But with numerous tax obstacles to navigate around, the feature offers some practical guidance as to how a company looking to direct resources to India can avoid the tax pitfalls of foreign investment.

FURTHER READING:


COVER STORY: How to successfully invest into India

INSIGHT: What to expect in next month's budget

ANALYSIS: How India’s increased OECD cooperation will increase taxpayer scrutiny



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
Sponsored by Deloitte
Sameer Nurmohamed, partner, Deloitte Legal Canada
Sponsored by Deloitte
George Ankomah, partner, Tax & Regulatory Services, Deloitte Africa (Ghana)
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
The big four spin-off firm becomes Taxand’s second UK member; in other news, Haynes Boone launched a UK tax practice
Sponsored by Deloitte Luxembourg
Jean-Michel Henry and Mona El-Begawi of Deloitte Luxembourg examine the complexities created by timing differences in Luxembourg, EU, and OECD tax regimes
Stephanie Pantelidaki’s economic expertise will give Norton Rose Fulbright’s other teams ‘extra firepower,’ she says
Sponsored by MFA Legal & Tech
Samuel Fernandes de Almeida of MFA Legal & Tech assesses whether Portugal’s 7.5% surcharge on non-residents aligns with the EU’s free movement of capital principle and passes the proportionality test
Gift this article