Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher

Spain: Supreme Court provides guidance on thin capitalisation rules

01 February 2012

Francisco Lavandera

Traditionally, the application of thin capitalisation rules has triggered a number of questions which have been extensively debated by tax commentators. Some of them have been clarified by the Spanish courts or the Directorate-General of Taxes in various rulings, but some others have remained open to discussion.

Two Supreme Court judgments, both rendered in the course of 2011 (March 17 and November 2, respectively), have provided interpretation guidelines on two of those controversial issues relating to the application of the thin capitalisation rules, namely:

The compatibility of the domestic thin capitalisation regulations and the non-discrimination clause contained in tax treaties; and The delimitation of the concept of indirect indebtedness in cases where the related party is not the lender but the guarantor of the loan. Thin capitalisation and tax treaties A previous judgement of the Supreme Court, dated October 1 2009, had already declared the incompatibility of the thin capitalisation rules...



This article is locked content, available to current subscribers or trialists.

  • Current subscribers or trialists - Please log in to view this article in full.
  • New users - Please take a free 7 day trial.
  • Expired subscribers or trialists - Please subscribe to gain immediate full access.

If you think you've received this message in error, please contact your account manager, Nick Burroughs:
Email: nburroughs@euromoneyplc.com, Tel: +44 (0)207 779 8379

Subscribe now

Subscribe today to gain full access to International Tax Review.

Subscribe

Free trial

Take a free trial now and gain 7 days of full access to International Tax Review.

Free trial





International Tax Review Profile

Breathless number of #internationaltax measures in #FederalBudget #Australia https://t.co/Ka8NpPbG3Y #DPT #antiavoidance #hybridmismatches

May 3 2016 04:26 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

RT @ICIJorg: #PanamaPapers #LuxLeaks IMPACT: Australia to raise billions through multinational tax crackdown https://t.co/rw75693utK

May 3 2016 04:19 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

RT @ato_gov_au: #Budget2016 has been released. You can access the Budget papers from https://t.co/F9lRT34iR7 https://t.co/aUhSzQT6P9

May 3 2016 04:16 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

RT @Sloweymcmanus: From @intltaxreview "What the US presidential hopefuls are saying on tax reform" @SullivanLaw https://t.co/Ld8JZMVc9Q

May 3 2016 04:15 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

RT @KPMGSingapore: Congratulations to @HongBengTay, Warrick Cleine, Khoon Ming Ho on being shortlisted for @IntlTaxReview Asia awards. http…

Apr 28 2016 10:22 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Correspondents