Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher

Spain: Supreme Court provides guidance on thin capitalisation rules

01 February 2012

Francisco Lavandera

Traditionally, the application of thin capitalisation rules has triggered a number of questions which have been extensively debated by tax commentators. Some of them have been clarified by the Spanish courts or the Directorate-General of Taxes in various rulings, but some others have remained open to discussion.

Two Supreme Court judgments, both rendered in the course of 2011 (March 17 and November 2, respectively), have provided interpretation guidelines on two of those controversial issues relating to the application of the thin capitalisation rules, namely:

The compatibility of the domestic thin capitalisation regulations and the non-discrimination clause contained in tax treaties; and The delimitation of the concept of indirect indebtedness in cases where the related party is not the lender but the guarantor of the loan. Thin capitalisation and tax treaties A previous judgement of the Supreme Court, dated October 1 2009, had already declared the incompatibility of the thin capitalisation rules...



This article is locked content, available to current subscribers or trialists.

  • Current subscribers or trialists - Please log in to view this article in full.
  • New users - Please take a free 7 day trial.
  • Expired subscribers or trialists - Please subscribe to gain immediate full access.

If you think you've received this message in error, please contact your account manager, Nick Burroughs:
Email: nburroughs@euromoneyplc.com, Tel: +44 (0)207 779 8379

Subscribe now

Subscribe today to gain full access to International Tax Review.

Subscribe

Free trial

Take a free trial now and gain 7 days of full access to International Tax Review.

Free trial





International Tax Review Profile

@UKSupremeCourt verdict in Shop Direct v HMRC out next Wednesday #taxrepayment and #corporationtax https://t.co/xDGnYyqp83

Feb 11 2016 10:04 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

UK government gets retaliation in first before today's @CommonsPAC hearing with @Google @HMRCgovuk https://t.co/tJnTK2jZJY

Feb 11 2016 02:23 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

RT @tosacarte: #globaltax50 Clearer and more vocal output from Asia s/b necessary for further developments https://t.co/EIBcBeKgCr @IntlTa…

Feb 11 2016 01:45 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

RT @ChevezTaxCenter: "2016 brings tax changes for foreign pension funds in Mexico", by CRZ´s Raul Morales, published in @IntlTaxReview htt…

Feb 11 2016 01:45 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Correspondents